17-58694971-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_058216.3(RAD51C):c.186A>G(p.Gln62=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000539 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
RAD51C
NM_058216.3 synonymous
NM_058216.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0810
Genes affected
RAD51C (HGNC:9820): (RAD51 paralog C) This gene is a member of the RAD51 family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 and are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein can interact with other RAD51 paralogs and is reported to be important for Holliday junction resolution. Mutations in this gene are associated with Fanconi anemia-like syndrome. This gene is one of four localized to a region of chromosome 17q23 where amplification occurs frequently in breast tumors. Overexpression of the four genes during amplification has been observed and suggests a possible role in tumor progression. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 17-58694971-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58694971-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138869.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.081 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00302 (460/152296) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0102 (426/41570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00944. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 207 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51C | NM_058216.3 | c.186A>G | p.Gln62= | synonymous_variant | 2/9 | ENST00000337432.9 | NP_478123.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51C | ENST00000337432.9 | c.186A>G | p.Gln62= | synonymous_variant | 2/9 | 1 | NM_058216.3 | ENSP00000336701 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00300 AC: 457AN: 152178Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
457
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000799 AC: 201AN: 251420Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000552 AC XY: 75AN XY: 135896
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
201
AN:
251420
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
75
AN XY:
135896
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000280 AC: 410AN: 1461832Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000235 AC XY: 171AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
410
AN:
1461832
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
171
AN XY:
727218
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00302 AC: 460AN: 152296Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00278 AC XY: 207AN XY: 74476
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
460
AN:
152296
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
207
AN XY:
74476
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 14, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 01, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 30, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 23, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 01, 2016 | Variant summary: The c.186A>G (p.GLn62=) in RAD51C gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.001(123/121184 chrs tested), predominantly in individuals of African origin (0.01; 117/10292 control chrs). This frequency greatly exceeds the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.00006) in this gene. The variant of interest has been reported in several affected individuals in co-occurrence with known pathogenic variant in BRCA2 gene in at least 1HBOC family. In addition, the variant has been classified as Benign by reputable databases/clinical laboratory. Taking together, the variant was classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 05, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 25, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 25, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 17, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Sep 13, 2017 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group O Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 25, 2016 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 09, 2022 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The RAD51C p.Gln62= variant was identified in 3 of 4196 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from American, Danish and Spanish individuals or families with non-BRCA1/2 hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (Zheng_2010_20697805, Romero_2011_21537932, Jonson_2015_26740214, Clague_2011_21980511). In 1 proband, the variant co-occurred with a disease-causing BRCA2 mutation (p.Lys172Lys) (Jonson_2015_26740214). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs28363303) “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Prevention Genetics, Counsyl, and likely benign by Illumina, and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan), and Clinvitae (6x) but was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 279 (1 homozygous) of 277224 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 254 of 24038 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), Latino in 18 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), European Non-Finnish in 5 of 126712 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), and South Asian in 2 of 30776 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), while not observed in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and European Finnish populations. The p.Gln62= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at