17-58694971-A-G

Variant names:

• chr17-58694971-A-G
• rs28363303
• NM_058216.3:c.186A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_058216.3(RAD51C):​c.186A>G​(p.Gln62Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000539 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 (4 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 (2 hom.)
• Consequence: RAD51C NM_058216.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0810

Genes affected

RAD51C (HGNC:9820): (RAD51 paralog C) This gene is a member of the RAD51 family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 and are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein can interact with other RAD51 paralogs and is reported to be important for Holliday junction resolution. Mutations in this gene are associated with Fanconi anemia-like syndrome. This gene is one of four localized to a region of chromosome 17q23 where amplification occurs frequently in breast tumors. Overexpression of the four genes during amplification has been observed and suggests a possible role in tumor progression. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
• BP6: Variant 17-58694971-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58694971-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138869.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.081 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00302 (460/152296) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0102 (426/41570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00944. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 207 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD51C	NM_058216.3	c.186A>G	p.Gln62Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 9	ENST00000337432.9	NP_478123.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD51C	ENST00000337432.9	c.186A>G	p.Gln62Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 9	1	NM_058216.3	ENSP00000336701.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00300 AC: 457 AN: 152178 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0102

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00183

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000799 AC: 201 AN: 251420 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000552 AC XY: 75 AN XY: 135896

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0108

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000520

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000280 AC: 410 AN: 1461832 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000235 AC XY: 171 AN XY: 727218

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00950

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000581

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000207

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000662

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00302 AC: 460 AN: 152296 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00278 AC XY: 207 AN XY: 74476

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0102

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00183

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000947

Alfa AF: 0.00147 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00325

Asia WGS AF: 0.000577 AC: 2 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00

EpiControl AF: 0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:21

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5

Jul 01, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.186A>G (p.GLn62=) in RAD51C gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.001(123/121184 chrs tested), predominantly in individuals of African origin (0.01; 117/10292 control chrs). This frequency greatly exceeds the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.00006) in this gene. The variant of interest has been reported in several affected individuals in co-occurrence with known pathogenic variant in BRCA2 gene in at least 1HBOC family. In addition, the variant has been classified as Benign by reputable databases/clinical laboratory. Taking together, the variant was classified as Benign. -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Aug 23, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 30, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

RAD51C: BP4, BP7 -

not specified Benign:4

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 14, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 01, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:4

Apr 05, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 25, 2016

Counsyl

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3

Nov 25, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 13, 2017

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 17, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group O Benign:3

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 25, 2016

Counsyl

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1

Nov 09, 2022

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1

-

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The RAD51C p.Gln62= variant was identified in 3 of 4196 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from American, Danish and Spanish individuals or families with non-BRCA1/2 hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (Zheng_2010_20697805, Romero_2011_21537932, Jonson_2015_26740214, Clague_2011_21980511). In 1 proband, the variant co-occurred with a disease-causing BRCA2 mutation (p.Lys172Lys) (Jonson_2015_26740214). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs28363303) “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Prevention Genetics, Counsyl, and likely benign by Illumina, and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan), and Clinvitae (6x) but was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 279 (1 homozygous) of 277224 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 254 of 24038 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), Latino in 18 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), European Non-Finnish in 5 of 126712 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), and South Asian in 2 of 30776 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), while not observed in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and European Finnish populations. The p.Gln62= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.59
CADD	Benign	0.99
DANN	Benign	0.70

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.050		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28363303; hg19: chr17-56772332;