17-58703291-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_058216.3(RAD51C):c.667G>T(p.Val223Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_058216.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3
- -
The p.V223F variant (also known as c.667G>T), located in coding exon 4 of the RAD51C gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 667. The valine at codon 223 is replaced by phenylalanine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
PM2_Supporting c.667G>T, located in exon 4 of the RAD51C gene, is predicted to result in the substitution of Val by Phe at codon 223, p.(Val223Phe). t is not present in the population database gnomAD v2.1.1, non cancer dataset (PM2_supporting). The SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing, but the REVEL meta-predictor score (0.44) for this variant is indeterminate regarding the effect that it may have on protein function according Pejaver 2022 thresholds (PMID: 36413997). To our knowledge, neither clinical data nor functional studies have been reported for this variant. It has only been reported twice in ClinVar, as an uncertain significance variant. Based on currently available information, the variant c.667G>T should be considered an uncertain significance variant. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
No publications associated with this variant yet.