17-58709841-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_058216.3(RAD51C):​c.706-18T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000556 in 1,594,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00054 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

RAD51C
NM_058216.3 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.129

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD51C (HGNC:9820): (RAD51 paralog C) This gene is a member of the RAD51 family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 and are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein can interact with other RAD51 paralogs and is reported to be important for Holliday junction resolution. Mutations in this gene are associated with Fanconi anemia-like syndrome. This gene is one of four localized to a region of chromosome 17q23 where amplification occurs frequently in breast tumors. Overexpression of the four genes during amplification has been observed and suggests a possible role in tumor progression. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
RAD51C Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group O
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-58709841-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58709841-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 142154.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000663 (101/152276) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0116 (60/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00923. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 64 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RAD51CNM_058216.3 linkc.706-18T>C intron_variant Intron 4 of 8 ENST00000337432.9 NP_478123.1 O43502-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RAD51CENST00000337432.9 linkc.706-18T>C intron_variant Intron 4 of 8 1 NM_058216.3 ENSP00000336701.4 O43502-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000670
AC:
102
AN:
152158
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00123
AC:
308
AN:
251244
AF XY:
0.00109
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0116
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000141
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00131
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000544
AC:
785
AN:
1441724
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.000529
AC XY:
380
AN XY:
718330
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000182
AC:
6
AN:
33008
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44672
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26018
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0120
AC:
476
AN:
39544
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000396
AC:
34
AN:
85808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00205
AC:
109
AN:
53268
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5728
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000978
AC:
107
AN:
1093906
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000887
AC:
53
AN:
59772
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
44
88
133
177
221
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000663
AC:
101
AN:
152276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000859
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000120
AC:
5
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0116
AC:
60
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00124
AC:
6
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00226
AC:
24
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000588
AC:
4
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000946
AC:
2
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5
11
16
22
27
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000159
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000397
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00606
AC:
21
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Jan 08, 2018
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 13, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:3
Apr 05, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 09, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Apr 22, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Fanconi anemia complementation group O Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 09, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Oct 19, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Nov 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

RAD51C: BS1, BS2 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
6.0
DANN
Benign
0.57
PhyloP100
-0.13
PromoterAI
0.0035
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56401264; hg19: chr17-56787202; API