17-61683587-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1
The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):āc.3459T>Cā(p.Asp1153=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000673 in 1,612,548 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00069 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00067 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
BRIP1
NM_032043.3 synonymous
NM_032043.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.557
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 17-61683587-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61683587-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136580.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=10, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.557 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000672 (981/1460248) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0158 (91/5766). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0132. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 520 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | NM_032043.3 | c.3459T>C | p.Asp1153= | synonymous_variant | 20/20 | ENST00000259008.7 | NP_114432.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | ENST00000259008.7 | c.3459T>C | p.Asp1153= | synonymous_variant | 20/20 | 1 | NM_032043.3 | ENSP00000259008 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000690 AC: 105AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
105
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000768 AC: 192AN: 250048Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000872 AC XY: 118AN XY: 135298
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
192
AN:
250048
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
118
AN XY:
135298
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000672 AC: 981AN: 1460248Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000716 AC XY: 520AN XY: 726506
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
981
AN:
1460248
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
520
AN XY:
726506
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000689 AC: 105AN: 152300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000631 AC XY: 47AN XY: 74468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
105
AN:
152300
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
74468
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 25, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 16, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 06, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 10, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 05, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 22, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Nov 02, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | BRIP1: BP4, BP7 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 22, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRIP1 p.Asp1153= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, and Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs4987050) as with uncertain significance allele, in the ClinVar database as benign by GeneDx, Invitae; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Counsyl, Color Genomics, Quest Diagnostics, Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano and ARUP Laboratories; and with uncertain significance by Illumina Clinical Services. The variant was identified in control databases in 201 of 275956 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0007 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). In addition, the variant was identified in the1000 Genomes Project in 1 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002) and in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project in 6 of 8598 European American and in 1 of 4406 African American alleles. The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 3 of 24010 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), Other in 18 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Latino in 36 of 34368 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European Non-Finnish in 116 of 126504 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Ashkenazi Jewish in 14 of 10146 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), and South Asian in 14 of 30730 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), while the variant was not observed in the East Asian, European Finnish populations. The p.Asp1153= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Aug 12, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 01, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 13, 2023 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
BRIP1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 31, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Aug 12, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at