17-61683587-A-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.3459T>C(p.Asp1153Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000673 in 1,612,548 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00069 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00067 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.557

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

BRIP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

familial ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Illumina
Fanconi anemia complementation group J
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
colorectal adenoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

BRIP1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).

BP6

Variant 17-61683587-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61683587-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 136580.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.557 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000672 (981/1460248) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.0158 (91/5766). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0132. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 520 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRIP1	NM_032043.3 link	c.3459T>C	p.Asp1153Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 20	ENST00000259008.7	NP_114432.2	Q9BX63-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRIP1	ENST00000259008.7 link	c.3459T>C	p.Asp1153Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 20	1	NM_032043.3	ENSP00000259008.2		Q9BX63-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000690

AC:

105

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000576

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0222

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000970

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000768

AC:

192

AN:

250048

AF XY:

0.000872

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000617

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00139

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000978

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00196

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000672

AC:

981

AN:

1460248

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000716

AC XY:

520

AN XY:

726506

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000568

AC:

AN:

33442

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00110

AC:

AN:

44692

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00107

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39672

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000626

AC:

AN:

86218

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52060

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0158

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000600

AC:

667

AN:

1111906

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00121

AC:

AN:

60366

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

116

173

231

289

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

104

130

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000689

AC:

105

AN:

152300

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000631

AC XY:

AN XY:

74468

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000168

AC:

AN:

41558

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00118

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000576

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000415

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0238

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000970

AC:

AN:

68024

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000609

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000669

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3476

EpiCase

AF:

0.00136

EpiControl

AF:

0.00148

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:18

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRIP1 p.Asp1153= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, and Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs4987050) as with uncertain significance allele, in the ClinVar database as benign by GeneDx, Invitae; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Counsyl, Color Genomics, Quest Diagnostics, Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano and ARUP Laboratories; and with uncertain significance by Illumina Clinical Services. The variant was identified in control databases in 201 of 275956 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0007 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). In addition, the variant was identified in the1000 Genomes Project in 1 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002) and in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project in 6 of 8598 European American and in 1 of 4406 African American alleles. The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 3 of 24010 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), Other in 18 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Latino in 36 of 34368 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European Non-Finnish in 116 of 126504 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Ashkenazi Jewish in 14 of 10146 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), and South Asian in 14 of 30730 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), while the variant was not observed in the East Asian, European Finnish populations. The p.Asp1153= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

May 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

BRIP1: BP4, BP7 -

Oct 22, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 08, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:4

Jul 22, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 05, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

- -

Apr 10, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 02, 2017

True Health Diagnostics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 06, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 16, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group J

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Aug 12, 2016

Counsyl

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:2

Mar 01, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Apr 13, 2023

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Aug 12, 2016

Counsyl

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

BRIP1-related disorder

Benign:1

May 31, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.87

CADD

Benign

0.73

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.28

PhyloP100

0.56

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over