Menu
GeneBe

17-61743106-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):​c.2286T>C​(p.Arg762=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00038 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.51
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 17-61743106-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61743106-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136575.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.51 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0016 (243/152318) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00496 (206/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0044. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 124 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRIP1NM_032043.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2286T>C p.Arg762= synonymous_variant 16/20 ENST00000259008.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRIP1ENST00000259008.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2286T>C p.Arg762= synonymous_variant 16/201 NM_032043.3 P2Q9BX63-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00159
AC:
242
AN:
152200
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00495
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00334
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000545
AC:
137
AN:
251252
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000471
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
135784
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00541
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000636
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000254
AC:
371
AN:
1461700
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000226
AC XY:
164
AN XY:
727142
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00600
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000872
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00160
AC:
243
AN:
152318
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00167
AC XY:
124
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00496
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.000723
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00203
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024BRIP1: BP4, BP7 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 07, 2016Variant summary: The BRIP1 c.2286T>C variant affects a conserved nucleotide, resulting in no amino acid change. One in-silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 3/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE site of SF2/ASF (IgM-BRCA1). However, these predictions have not been confirmed by experimental studies. This variant is found in 61/121286 control chromosomes (1 homozygote) at a frequency of 0.0005029, which is about 8 times the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic BRIP1 allele (0.0000625), suggesting this variant is benign. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories classified this variant as likely benign/benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 31, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 16, 2022- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 08, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Jul 12, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 25, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 23, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 19, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 03, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 11, 2017- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylSep 06, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMay 01, 2023- -
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRIP1 p.Arg762= variant was identified in 1 of 188 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with prostate cancer (Ray 2009). The variant was also identified in the following databases, dbSNP (ID: rs61754141) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (7x, as benign by GeneDx, Invitae, as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Counsyl, as uncertain significance by Illumina), Clinvitae (6x, with conflicting predictions as benign, likely benign and uncertain significance), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (1x with unknown pathogenicity). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 179 of 276976 (1 homozygous) chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0006 in the following populations: African in 129 of 24038 (1 homozygous) chromosomes (freq. 0.005), other in 2 of 6462 chromosomes (freq. 0.0003), Latino in 25 of 34400 chromosomes (freq. 0.0007), European in 22 of 126538 chromosomes (freq. 0.0002), and South Asian in 1 of 30782 chromosomes (freq. 0.00003), increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Arg762Arg variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 01, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylSep 06, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
8.3
DANN
Benign
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61754141; hg19: chr17-59820467; API