17-61793628-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP6
The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.1442G>A(p.Gly481Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000079 in 1,607,944 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G481C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032043.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | NM_032043.3 | c.1442G>A | p.Gly481Asp | missense_variant | 10/20 | ENST00000259008.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | ENST00000259008.7 | c.1442G>A | p.Gly481Asp | missense_variant | 10/20 | 1 | NM_032043.3 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152044Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000119 AC: 29AN: 243572Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 14AN XY: 131420
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000852 AC: 124AN: 1455900Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000829 AC XY: 60AN XY: 723844
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152044Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74252
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 09, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 29, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 11, 2020 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Oct 10, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 01, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 19, 2021 | Variant summary: BRIP1 c.1442G>A (p.Gly481Asp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00012 in 243572 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0015 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 24 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRIP1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (6.3e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.1442G>A has been reported in the literature in the TGCA cohort (Lu_2015), in studies reporting cohorts of individuals of east asian ancestry undergoing multigene panel testing and in unaffected control cohorts (example, Wong_2016, Kim_2016, Hayano_2016, Ohmoto_2018, Fujita_2020). One of these studies has recently rendered a final classification for this variant a benign among individuals undergoing population-based screening for hereditary colorectal cancer variants in Japan (Fujita_2020). Therefore, none of the ascertained reports provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories and the LOVD have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple submitters reported the variant with conflicting assessments (LOVD database-benign, n=1; likely benign, n=1, VUS, n=6). Most submitters reporting a VUS classification cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | Aug 13, 2019 | Curator: Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Yukihide Momozawa. - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 481 of the BRIP1 protein (p.Gly481Asp). This variant is present in population databases (rs200062099, gnomAD 0.1%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 26689913, 26790966, 27701467, 29263802, 29667044). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141975). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt BRIP1 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 12, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 18, 2022 | Observed in individuals with breast cancer, prostate cancer, or other cancers (Lu 2015, Ballinger 2016, Hayano 2016, Kim 2016, Wong 2016, Pfaendler 2019); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22578220, 33309985, 31214711, 32566746, 32068069, 24686850, 26790966, 24163242, 25256751, 26689913, 26709662, 27498913, 27701467, 30055942, 29263802, 30723762, 33471991, 29667044) - |
Neoplasm of ovary;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Apr 02, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research | May 01, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at