17-61808507-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):ā€‹c.878A>Gā€‹(p.Asn293Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,578 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 missense

Scores

7
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.67
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.28794932).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRIP1NM_032043.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.878A>G p.Asn293Ser missense_variant 7/20 ENST00000259008.7 NP_114432.2 Q9BX63-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRIP1ENST00000259008.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.878A>G p.Asn293Ser missense_variant 7/201 NM_032043.3 ENSP00000259008.2 Q9BX63-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000797
AC:
2
AN:
250894
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000738
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135578
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000479
AC:
7
AN:
1461578
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000413
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
727114
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
0.0000468
Hom.:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 10, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 18, 2021Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with uterine cancer (Lu 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26689913) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2023This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 19, 2023This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 293 of the BRIP1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 0/60466 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRIP1_000627), and it also has been reported in an individual affected with uterine cancer (PMID: 26689913). This variant has been identified in 2/250894 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 24, 2024This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 293 of the BRIP1 protein (p.Asn293Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs746599076, gnomAD 0.006%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BRIP1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 279708). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRIP1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.088
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.27
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.53
D;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.39
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.46
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.024
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.29
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.79
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L;L
PrimateAI
Benign
0.47
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
0.20
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.25
T;T
Polyphen
0.94
P;.
Vest4
0.20
MutPred
0.29
Gain of methylation at K297 (P = 0.1457);Gain of methylation at K297 (P = 0.1457);
MVP
0.68
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.43
T
GERP RS
5.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.14
gMVP
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs746599076; hg19: chr17-59885868; API