17-61808683-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):​c.702G>A​(p.Lys234Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000868 in 1,613,816 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000093 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.33
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 17-61808683-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61808683-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 183895.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.34 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRIP1NM_032043.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.702G>A p.Lys234Lys synonymous_variant 7/20 ENST00000259008.7 NP_114432.2 Q9BX63-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRIP1ENST00000259008.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.702G>A p.Lys234Lys synonymous_variant 7/201 NM_032043.3 ENSP00000259008.2 Q9BX63-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000478
AC:
12
AN:
251154
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000368
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135724
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000969
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000930
AC:
136
AN:
1461680
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000921
AC XY:
67
AN XY:
727148
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000375
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000117
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74312
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000232
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000302
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsMay 29, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 12, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 30, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Sep 27, 2021- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 12, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 23, 2022- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoFeb 15, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Feb 28, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioAug 18, 2022- -
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 26, 2024- -
BRIP1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 29, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylAug 09, 2016- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRIP1 p.Lys234Lys variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs45512798) as “With Likely benign allele”, in ClinVar and Clinvitae databases as benign by GeneDx and as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Counsyl and Colon Genomics Inc. The variant was identified in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project in 1 of 8600 European American and 1 of 4406 African American alleles. The variant was identified in control databases in 12 of 245898 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00005 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Observations by population include African in 1 of 15302 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), European Non-Finnish in 11 of 111400 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001); the variant was not observed in the “Other”, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The variant was identified in 1 individual with breast cancer in our laboratory, co-occurring with a pathogenic ATM variant (c.2284_2285del, p.Leu762ValfsX2), increasing the likelihood the variant has little clinical significance. The p.Lys234= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylAug 09, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
7.1
DANN
Benign
0.57

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45512798; hg19: chr17-59886044; COSMIC: COSV99371412; API