17-61847151-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.577G>A(p.Val193Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00395 in 1,613,630 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032043.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | NM_032043.3 | c.577G>A | p.Val193Ile | missense_variant | 6/20 | ENST00000259008.7 | NP_114432.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | ENST00000259008.7 | c.577G>A | p.Val193Ile | missense_variant | 6/20 | 1 | NM_032043.3 | ENSP00000259008.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00306 AC: 466AN: 152172Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00370 AC: 931AN: 251342Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00379 AC XY: 515AN XY: 135844
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00405 AC: 5912AN: 1461340Hom.: 33 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00404 AC XY: 2936AN XY: 727010
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00305 AC: 464AN: 152290Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00290 AC XY: 216AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 07, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | BRIP1: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not specified Benign:7Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 27, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 09, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 14, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 09, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | May 30, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 04, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 15, 2015 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 02, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 23, 2021 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 25, 2016 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 01, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRIP1 p.Val193Ile variant was identified in 4 of 726 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) from individuals with breast and prostate cancer and was present in 14 of 4556 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from healthy individuals (Kote-Jarai 2009,Rutter 2003, Vahteristo 2006, Wong 2011). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs4988346) as “with benign allele”, ClinVar (interpreted as "benign" by Invitae and 8 others and "likely benign" by True Health Diagnostics). The variant was identified in control databases in 986 of 277,084 chromosomes (9 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 13 of 24,026 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Other in 39 of 6462 chromosomes (freq: 0.006), Latino in 135 of 34,414 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), European in 650 of 126,616 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), Ashkenazi Jewish in 54 of 10,148 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), Finnish in 27 of 25,780 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), and South Asian in 68 of 30,782 chromosomes (freq: 0.002). The variant was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Val193 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 25, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at