17-61847151-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):​c.577G>A​(p.Val193Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00395 in 1,613,630 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0040 ( 33 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:30O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.580

Publications

36 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
BRIP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Illumina
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group J
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • colorectal adenoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005566299).
BP6
Variant 17-61847151-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61847151-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 128192.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00305 (464/152290) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0049 (333/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00446. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 216 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRIP1NM_032043.3 linkc.577G>A p.Val193Ile missense_variant Exon 6 of 20 ENST00000259008.7 NP_114432.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRIP1ENST00000259008.7 linkc.577G>A p.Val193Ile missense_variant Exon 6 of 20 1 NM_032043.3 ENSP00000259008.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00306
AC:
466
AN:
152172
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000748
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0132
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00489
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00370
AC:
931
AN:
251342
AF XY:
0.00379
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00393
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00556
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000832
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00536
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00571
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00405
AC:
5912
AN:
1461340
Hom.:
33
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00404
AC XY:
2936
AN XY:
727010
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000628
AC:
21
AN:
33454
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00369
AC:
165
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00505
AC:
132
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39646
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00255
AC:
220
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00114
AC:
61
AN:
53404
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00937
AC:
54
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00451
AC:
5011
AN:
1111608
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00411
AC:
248
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.466
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
309
617
926
1234
1543
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
180
360
540
720
900
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00305
AC:
464
AN:
152290
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00290
AC XY:
216
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000746
AC:
31
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00307
AC:
47
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00374
AC:
13
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
7
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000943
AC:
10
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00490
AC:
333
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00379
AC:
8
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
22
44
65
87
109
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00450
Hom.:
12
Bravo
AF:
0.00340
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00378
AC:
14
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00234
AC:
9
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000908
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00558
AC:
48
ExAC
AF:
0.00396
AC:
481
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00643
EpiControl
AF:
0.00806

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:30Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:8
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BRIP1: BP4, BS2 -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 08, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:7Other:1
May 14, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 27, 2019
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 09, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Aug 04, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Oct 09, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

May 30, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2024
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:3
Mar 02, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 23, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

May 25, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
May 01, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ovarian cancer Benign:1
May 25, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BRIP1 p.Val193Ile variant was identified in 4 of 726 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) from individuals with breast and prostate cancer and was present in 14 of 4556 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from healthy individuals (Kote-Jarai 2009,Rutter 2003, Vahteristo 2006, Wong 2011). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs4988346) as “with benign allele”, ClinVar (interpreted as "benign" by Invitae and 8 others and "likely benign" by True Health Diagnostics). The variant was identified in control databases in 986 of 277,084 chromosomes (9 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.004 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 13 of 24,026 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Other in 39 of 6462 chromosomes (freq: 0.006), Latino in 135 of 34,414 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), European in 650 of 126,616 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), Ashkenazi Jewish in 54 of 10,148 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), Finnish in 27 of 25,780 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), and South Asian in 68 of 30,782 chromosomes (freq: 0.002). The variant was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Val193 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.60
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
0.028
DANN
Benign
0.54
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.093
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.8
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0096
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.40
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.043
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0056
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;L
PhyloP100
-0.58
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.26
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.071
Sift
Benign
0.91
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.61
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.
Vest4
0.035
MVP
0.29
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.0013
T
GERP RS
-8.2
PromoterAI
0.0035
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.010
gMVP
0.14
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4988346; hg19: chr17-59924512; API