17-63942988-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000334.4(SCN4A):āc.4126A>Gā(p.Asn1376Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.534 in 1,613,618 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 233,301 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.59 ( 27022 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.53 ( 206279 hom. )
Consequence
SCN4A
NM_000334.4 missense
NM_000334.4 missense
Scores
3
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.06
Genes affected
SCN4A (HGNC:10591): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 4) Voltage-gated sodium channels are transmembrane glycoprotein complexes composed of a large alpha subunit with 24 transmembrane domains and one or more regulatory beta subunits. They are responsible for the generation and propagation of action potentials in neurons and muscle. This gene encodes one member of the sodium channel alpha subunit gene family. It is expressed in skeletal muscle, and mutations in this gene have been linked to several myotonia and periodic paralysis disorders. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
PM1
In a repeat IV (size 298) in uniprot entity SCN4A_HUMAN there are 26 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (96%) in NM_000334.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=6.990708E-6).
BP6
Variant 17-63942988-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-63942988-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130236.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-63942988-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.726 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN4A | NM_000334.4 | c.4126A>G | p.Asn1376Asp | missense_variant | 23/24 | ENST00000435607.3 | NP_000325.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN4A | ENST00000435607.3 | c.4126A>G | p.Asn1376Asp | missense_variant | 23/24 | 1 | NM_000334.4 | ENSP00000396320.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.588 AC: 89335AN: 151984Hom.: 26984 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
89335
AN:
151984
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.523 AC: 131470AN: 251184Hom.: 35211 AF XY: 0.518 AC XY: 70269AN XY: 135752
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
131470
AN:
251184
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
70269
AN XY:
135752
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.528 AC: 771980AN: 1461516Hom.: 206279 Cov.: 53 AF XY: 0.525 AC XY: 381860AN XY: 727046
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
771980
AN:
1461516
Hom.:
Cov.:
53
AF XY:
AC XY:
381860
AN XY:
727046
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.588 AC: 89426AN: 152102Hom.: 27022 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.581 AC XY: 43202AN XY: 74354
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
89426
AN:
152102
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
43202
AN XY:
74354
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
1989
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2031
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
3221
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
4574
ExAC
AF:
AC:
63556
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1608
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 25, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 02, 2014 | - - |
Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Paramyotonia congenita of Von Eulenburg Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Potassium-aggravated myotonia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Congenital myasthenic syndrome 16 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
B
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at