17-63963708-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000334.4(SCN4A):ā€‹c.1570A>Gā€‹(p.Ser524Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.92 in 1,596,468 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 675,812 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.92 ( 64234 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.92 ( 611578 hom. )

Consequence

SCN4A
NM_000334.4 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.211
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN4A (HGNC:10591): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 4) Voltage-gated sodium channels are transmembrane glycoprotein complexes composed of a large alpha subunit with 24 transmembrane domains and one or more regulatory beta subunits. They are responsible for the generation and propagation of action potentials in neurons and muscle. This gene encodes one member of the sodium channel alpha subunit gene family. It is expressed in skeletal muscle, and mutations in this gene have been linked to several myotonia and periodic paralysis disorders. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=8.298579E-7).
BP6
Variant 17-63963708-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-63963708-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130228.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-63963708-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.976 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SCN4ANM_000334.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1570A>G p.Ser524Gly missense_variant 10/24 ENST00000435607.3 NP_000325.4
LOC105371858XR_001752969.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.119-376T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
LOC105371858XR_001752970.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.174-376T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant
LOC105371858XR_934910.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.118+394T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN4AENST00000435607.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1570A>G p.Ser524Gly missense_variant 10/241 NM_000334.4 ENSP00000396320 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.918
AC:
139723
AN:
152196
Hom.:
64187
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.906
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.952
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.939
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.963
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.999
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.963
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.872
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.962
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.915
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.925
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.931
AC:
221561
AN:
238108
Hom.:
103297
AF XY:
0.932
AC XY:
121183
AN XY:
130012
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.904
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.964
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.968
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.962
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.873
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.911
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.927
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.920
AC:
1328395
AN:
1444154
Hom.:
611578
Cov.:
49
AF XY:
0.921
AC XY:
660311
AN XY:
716726
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.904
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.962
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.970
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.960
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.873
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.913
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.929
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.918
AC:
139826
AN:
152314
Hom.:
64234
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.918
AC XY:
68364
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.906
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.939
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.963
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.999
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.964
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.872
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.915
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.926
Alfa
AF:
0.922
Hom.:
123232
Bravo
AF:
0.921
TwinsUK
AF:
0.912
AC:
3382
ALSPAC
AF:
0.907
AC:
3497
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.908
AC:
3887
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.919
AC:
7806
ExAC
AF:
0.926
AC:
111993
Asia WGS
AF:
0.969
AC:
3370
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.925
EpiControl
AF:
0.921

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 02, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 05, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Familial hyperkalemic periodic paralysis Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Paramyotonia congenita of Von Eulenburg Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Paramyotonia congenita of Von Eulenburg;C0238357:Familial hyperkalemic periodic paralysis;C2750061:Hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 2;C2931826:Potassium-aggravated myotonia;C3280112:Congenital myasthenic syndrome 16 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsApr 14, 2017- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Potassium-aggravated myotonia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Congenital myasthenic syndrome 16 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.048
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.32
CADD
Benign
6.1
DANN
Benign
0.46
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.47
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.092
T
MetaRNN
Benign
8.3e-7
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.54
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.37
Sift
Benign
0.37
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.24
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.041
MPC
0.23
ClinPred
0.0022
T
GERP RS
1.6
Varity_R
0.039
gMVP
0.21

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6504191; hg19: chr17-62041068; COSMIC: COSV71128079; COSMIC: COSV71128079; API