17-6428483-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_014336.5(AIPL1):ā€‹c.300A>Gā€‹(p.Leu100=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.643 in 1,613,462 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 335,818 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.61 ( 28856 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes š‘“: 0.65 ( 306962 hom. )

Consequence

AIPL1
NM_014336.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.306
Variant links:
Genes affected
AIPL1 (HGNC:359): (aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein like 1) Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is the most severe inherited retinopathy with the earliest age of onset and accounts for at least 5% of all inherited retinal diseases. Affected individuals are diagnosed at birth or in the first few months of life with nystagmus, severely impaired vision or blindness and an abnormal or flat electroretinogram. The photoreceptor/pineal-expressed gene, AIPL1, encoding aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein-like 1, is located within the LCA4 candidate region. The encoded protein contains three tetratricopeptide motifs, consistent with chaperone or nuclear transport activity. Mutations in this gene may cause approximately 20% of recessive LCA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 17-6428483-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-6428483-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 166655.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-6428483-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-6428483-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic]. Variant chr17-6428483-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.306 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.658 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
AIPL1NM_014336.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.300A>G p.Leu100= synonymous_variant 3/6 ENST00000381129.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
AIPL1ENST00000381129.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.300A>G p.Leu100= synonymous_variant 3/61 NM_014336.5 P1Q9NZN9-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.610
AC:
92833
AN:
152074
Hom.:
28841
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.495
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.576
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.663
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.766
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.544
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.605
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.618
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.791
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.663
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.656
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.643
AC:
161264
AN:
250792
Hom.:
52550
AF XY:
0.644
AC XY:
87368
AN XY:
135604
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.489
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.708
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.769
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.548
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.610
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.619
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.661
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.673
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.646
AC:
944099
AN:
1461270
Hom.:
306962
Cov.:
64
AF XY:
0.646
AC XY:
469961
AN XY:
726968
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.491
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.702
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.770
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.546
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.618
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.616
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.652
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.648
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.610
AC:
92904
AN:
152192
Hom.:
28856
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.607
AC XY:
45177
AN XY:
74406
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.495
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.664
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.766
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.542
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.605
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.618
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.664
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.654
Alfa
AF:
0.661
Hom.:
67111
Bravo
AF:
0.611
Asia WGS
AF:
0.550
AC:
1913
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.678
EpiControl
AF:
0.683

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 20, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Leber congenital amaurosis 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Retinitis Pigmentosa, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
6.2
DANN
Benign
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs8075035; hg19: chr17-6331803; COSMIC: COSV51506018; API