17-65537463-G-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_004655.4(AXIN2):c.1573C>G(p.Pro525Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00154 in 1,613,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0086 ( 19 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00080 ( 22 hom. )

Consequence

AXIN2
NM_004655.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.15

Variant links:

Genes affected

AXIN2 (HGNC:904): (axin 2) The Axin-related protein, Axin2, presumably plays an important role in the regulation of the stability of beta-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway, like its rodent homologs, mouse conductin/rat axil. In mouse, conductin organizes a multiprotein complex of APC (adenomatous polyposis of the colon), beta-catenin, glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta, and conductin, which leads to the degradation of beta-catenin. Apparently, the deregulation of beta-catenin is an important event in the genesis of a number of malignancies. The AXIN2 gene has been mapped to 17q23-q24, a region that shows frequent loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer, neuroblastoma, and other tumors. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

AXIN2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0067765415).

BP6

Variant 17-65537463-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-65537463-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136483.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00861 (1309/152064) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0296 (1227/41506). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0282. There are 19 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 602 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1309 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
AXIN2	NM_004655.4 link	c.1573C>G	p.Pro525Ala	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 11	ENST00000307078.10	NP_004646.3	Q9Y2T1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
AXIN2	ENST00000307078.10 link	c.1573C>G	p.Pro525Ala	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 11	1	NM_004655.4	ENSP00000302625.5	Q9Y2T1
AXIN2	ENST00000375702.5 link	c.1573C>G	p.Pro525Ala	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 9	1		ENSP00000364854.5	E7ES00
AXIN2	ENST00000618960.4 link	c.1573C>G	p.Pro525Ala	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 10	5		ENSP00000478916.1	E7ES00

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00858

AC:

1303

AN:

151946

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0295

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00406

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00622

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00201

AC:

505

AN:

251430

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00148

AC XY:

201

AN XY:

135906

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0288

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000723

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000980

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000651

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000800

AC:

1170

AN:

1461872

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000688

AC XY:

500

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0292

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000984

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000104

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000207

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00187

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00861

AC:

1309

AN:

152064

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00810

AC XY:

602

AN XY:

74298

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0296

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00405

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000623

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00616

Alfa

AF:

0.00109

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00991

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0279

AC:

123

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00249

AC:

302

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:6

Mar 16, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 02, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 15, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: AXIN2 c.1573C>G (p.Pro525Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0026 in 277090 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 19-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in AXIN2 causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (0.00014), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1573C>G in individuals affected with Colorectal Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. A ClinVar submission from a clinical diagnostic laboratory (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 02, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome

Benign:2

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Oct 11, 2019

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Sep 20, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

AXIN2-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 18, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.091

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.46

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.41

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.82

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.24

.;T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.26

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.084

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.93

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.88

.;D;.

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0068

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.53

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

N;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.047

Sift

Benign

1.0

T;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.43

.;B;B

Vest4

0.29

MVP

0.42

MPC

0.21

ClinPred

0.0074

GERP RS

4.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

gMVP

0.40

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over