17-65537671-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004655.4(AXIN2):​c.1365A>G​(p.Pro455Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.895 in 1,559,288 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 625,484 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P455P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.90 ( 62168 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.89 ( 563316 hom. )

Consequence

AXIN2
NM_004655.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: -7.66

Publications

41 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AXIN2 (HGNC:904): (axin 2) The Axin-related protein, Axin2, presumably plays an important role in the regulation of the stability of beta-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway, like its rodent homologs, mouse conductin/rat axil. In mouse, conductin organizes a multiprotein complex of APC (adenomatous polyposis of the colon), beta-catenin, glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta, and conductin, which leads to the degradation of beta-catenin. Apparently, the deregulation of beta-catenin is an important event in the genesis of a number of malignancies. The AXIN2 gene has been mapped to 17q23-q24, a region that shows frequent loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer, neuroblastoma, and other tumors. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
AXIN2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • tooth agenesis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • craniosynostosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-65537671-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-65537671-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 259509.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-7.66 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.929 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AXIN2NM_004655.4 linkc.1365A>G p.Pro455Pro synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 11 ENST00000307078.10 NP_004646.3 Q9Y2T1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AXIN2ENST00000307078.10 linkc.1365A>G p.Pro455Pro synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 11 1 NM_004655.4 ENSP00000302625.5 Q9Y2T1
AXIN2ENST00000375702.5 linkc.1365A>G p.Pro455Pro synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 9 1 ENSP00000364854.5 E7ES00
AXIN2ENST00000618960.4 linkc.1365A>G p.Pro455Pro synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 10 5 ENSP00000478916.1 E7ES00

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.904
AC:
137242
AN:
151752
Hom.:
62111
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.932
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.896
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.897
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.948
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.816
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.951
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.899
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.965
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.891
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.916
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.902
AC:
154632
AN:
171458
AF XY:
0.904
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.933
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.891
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.948
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.824
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.894
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.892
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.910
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.894
AC:
1258681
AN:
1407418
Hom.:
563316
Cov.:
85
AF XY:
0.896
AC XY:
623035
AN XY:
695252
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.937
AC:
30427
AN:
32478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.893
AC:
32397
AN:
36298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.951
AC:
24000
AN:
25238
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.839
AC:
31214
AN:
37196
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.956
AC:
77856
AN:
81472
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.893
AC:
40524
AN:
45366
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.959
AC:
5410
AN:
5642
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.889
AC:
964310
AN:
1085240
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.898
AC:
52543
AN:
58488
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8922
17844
26766
35688
44610
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21138
42276
63414
84552
105690
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.904
AC:
137359
AN:
151870
Hom.:
62168
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.905
AC XY:
67149
AN XY:
74182
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.932
AC:
38666
AN:
41488
American (AMR)
AF:
0.897
AC:
13714
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.948
AC:
3287
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.816
AC:
4081
AN:
5000
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.952
AC:
4586
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.899
AC:
9508
AN:
10582
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.963
AC:
283
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.891
AC:
60482
AN:
67908
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.917
AC:
1937
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
690
1381
2071
2762
3452
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
902
1804
2706
3608
4510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.899
Hom.:
16342
Bravo
AF:
0.904
Asia WGS
AF:
0.874
AC:
3043
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome Benign:5
Jul 02, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 20, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 17, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The AXIN2 c.1365A>G (p.Pro455Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 0.914 (39107/42768 chromosomes, 17839 homozygotes), therefore suggesting that the G allele is the major allele (most commonly observed) found in the general population. Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Sep 10, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
0.48
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
-7.7
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9915936; hg19: chr17-63533789; COSMIC: COSV61055320; COSMIC: COSV61055320; API