17-65537801-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004655.4(AXIN2):āc.1235A>Gā(p.Asn412Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00793 in 1,586,748 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 165 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004655.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXIN2 | NM_004655.4 | c.1235A>G | p.Asn412Ser | missense_variant | 6/11 | ENST00000307078.10 | NP_004646.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXIN2 | ENST00000307078.10 | c.1235A>G | p.Asn412Ser | missense_variant | 6/11 | 1 | NM_004655.4 | ENSP00000302625.5 | ||
AXIN2 | ENST00000375702.5 | c.1235A>G | p.Asn412Ser | missense_variant | 5/9 | 1 | ENSP00000364854.5 | |||
AXIN2 | ENST00000618960.4 | c.1235A>G | p.Asn412Ser | missense_variant | 6/10 | 5 | ENSP00000478916.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00666 AC: 1012AN: 152004Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00975 AC: 1997AN: 204818Hom.: 41 AF XY: 0.0117 AC XY: 1300AN XY: 111560
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00807 AC: 11577AN: 1434626Hom.: 157 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00911 AC XY: 6474AN XY: 711028
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00665 AC: 1011AN: 152122Hom.: 8 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00748 AC XY: 556AN XY: 74348
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 25, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 27, 2016 | Variant summary: The c.1235A>G variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and 4/4 in silico tools predict a neutral outcome. The variant was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 2.5% which includes 20 homozygous occurrences, strong evidence that this is a benign polymorphism. Muliple reputable clinical labs have classified this variant as benign. Due to the high allele frequency of the variant in the general population, this variant has been classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 18, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 20, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Colorectal cancer;C1837750:Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 14, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 11, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
AXIN2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 17, 2022 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at