17-74299740-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_023036.6(DNAI2):​c.747C>T​(p.Gly249Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000796 in 1,613,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0043 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DNAI2
NM_023036.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0660
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAI2 (HGNC:18744): (dynein axonemal intermediate chain 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the dynein intermediate chain family, and is part of the dynein complex of respiratory cilia and sperm flagella. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia type 9. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.31).
BP6
Variant 17-74299740-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-74299740-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 261655.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.066 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00428 (651/152256) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0146 (608/41546). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0137. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 279 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNAI2NM_023036.6 linkc.747C>T p.Gly249Gly synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 14 ENST00000311014.11 NP_075462.3 Q9GZS0-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAI2ENST00000311014.11 linkc.747C>T p.Gly249Gly synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 14 1 NM_023036.6 ENSP00000308312.6 Q9GZS0-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00427
AC:
650
AN:
152138
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00622
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00131
AC:
328
AN:
250642
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000974
AC XY:
132
AN XY:
135528
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0168
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00127
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000881
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000434
AC:
634
AN:
1461258
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000393
AC XY:
286
AN XY:
726904
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000342
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000960
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00428
AC:
651
AN:
152256
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00375
AC XY:
279
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0146
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00616
Alfa
AF:
0.00279
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00536
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:3
Oct 10, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 22, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

May 06, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 9 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
CADD
Benign
9.1
DANN
Benign
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148488355; hg19: chr17-72295879; API