17-74920412-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_173477.5(USH1G):c.424G>A(p.Glu142Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00691 in 1,613,462 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 604 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.036 ( 300 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0039 ( 304 hom. )
Consequence
USH1G
NM_173477.5 missense
NM_173477.5 missense
Scores
6
9
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.00
Genes affected
USH1G (HGNC:16356): (USH1 protein network component sans) This gene encodes a protein that contains three ankyrin domains, a class I PDZ-binding motif and a sterile alpha motif. The encoded protein interacts with harmonin, which is associated with Usher syndrome type 1C. This protein plays a role in the development and maintenance of the auditory and visual systems and functions in the cohesion of hair bundles formed by inner ear sensory cells. Mutations in this gene are associated with Usher syndrome type 1G (USH1G). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0018402338).
BP6
Variant 17-74920412-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-74920412-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 48131.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-74920412-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.122 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH1G | NM_173477.5 | c.424G>A | p.Glu142Lys | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000614341.5 | NP_775748.2 | |
USH1G | NM_001282489.3 | c.115G>A | p.Glu39Lys | missense_variant | 2/3 | NP_001269418.1 | ||
USH1G | XM_011524296.2 | c.115G>A | p.Glu39Lys | missense_variant | 2/3 | XP_011522598.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH1G | ENST00000614341.5 | c.424G>A | p.Glu142Lys | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_173477.5 | ENSP00000480279.1 | ||
USH1G | ENST00000579243.1 | n.*23G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/3 | 2 | ENSP00000462568.1 | ||||
USH1G | ENST00000579243.1 | n.*23G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/3 | 2 | ENSP00000462568.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0362 AC: 5515AN: 152222Hom.: 299 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5515
AN:
152222
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00992 AC: 2481AN: 250192Hom.: 145 AF XY: 0.00730 AC XY: 989AN XY: 135556
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2481
AN:
250192
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
989
AN XY:
135556
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00385 AC: 5629AN: 1461122Hom.: 304 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.00339 AC XY: 2466AN XY: 726894
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5629
AN:
1461122
Hom.:
Cov.:
42
AF XY:
AC XY:
2466
AN XY:
726894
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0362 AC: 5521AN: 152340Hom.: 300 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0354 AC XY: 2635AN XY: 74496
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5521
AN:
152340
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
2635
AN XY:
74496
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
583
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1415
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 12, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 06, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 03, 2011 | Glu142Lys in exon 2 of USH1G: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 5.9% (300/5015) of a broad population (dbSNP rs111033466). - |
Usher syndrome type 1G Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
P
Vest4
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at