17-76270435-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_182565.4(UBALD2):c.425C>T(p.Thr142Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000335 in 1,523,662 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182565.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBALD2 | ENST00000327490.8 | c.425C>T | p.Thr142Met | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | 1 | NM_182565.4 | ENSP00000331298.6 | ||
UBALD2 | ENST00000589240.1 | c.245C>T | p.Thr82Met | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | 2 | ENSP00000466518.1 | |||
UBALD2 | ENST00000587913.1 | c.*52C>T | downstream_gene_variant | 3 | ENSP00000468297.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152018Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000493 AC: 6AN: 121754Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000601 AC XY: 4AN XY: 66520
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000335 AC: 46AN: 1371532Hom.: 0 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.0000370 AC XY: 25AN XY: 675004
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74376
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.425C>T (p.T142M) alteration is located in exon 3 (coding exon 3) of the UBALD2 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 425, causing the threonine (T) at amino acid position 142 to be replaced by a methionine (M). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at