17-7670709-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_000546.6(TP53):c.1000G>A(p.Gly334Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,528 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000546.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461528Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727038
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Li-Fraumeni syndrome Pathogenic:1
This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 334 of the TP53 protein (p.Gly334Arg). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with adrenocortical carcinoma (PMID: 25584008). A different variant (c.1000G>C) giving rise to the same protein effect has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including adrenocortical tumors, breast cancer, and hematological malignancies. However, c.1000G>C has also been observed in unaffected individuals, which is suggestive of reduced penetrance (PMID: 23580068, 24448499, 25452441, 25503501, 32675277; Invitae). Although the penetrance for each base change has yet to be established, evidence from the c.1000G>C variant suggests that c.1000G>A is also likely to be causative of disease. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 186086). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 12826609, 29979965, 30224644) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt TP53 function with a negative predictive value of 97.5%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect TP53 function (PMID: 12826609, 25584008, 29955864, 30224644, 32675277). RNA analysis performed to evaluate the impact of this missense change on mRNA splicing indicates it does not significantly alter splicing (Invitae). In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.G334R variant (also known as c.1000G>A), located in coding exon 9 of the TP53 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1000. The glycine at codon 334 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. Residue G334 is the hinge residue between the alpha helix and beta sheet in the tetramerization domain of the p53 protein (Clore et al. Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Apr;2(4):321-33) and has been shown to be sensitive to substitution through in vitro analysis and predictive modeling (Kawaguchi et al. Oncogene 2005 Oct 20;24(46):6976-81; Higa et al. Genet Mol Biol.2009 Jul;32(3):626-33). This variant was detected in an individual with ovarian cancer (Kanchi et al. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3156) and an individual with Her2+ breast cancer who met Chompret criteria for Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (Rath et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 May;139(1):193-8). However, yeast-based functional studies have shown that this variation has transactivation capability similar to wild type (Kato S et al.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8424-9). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited and conflicting at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at