17-7673805-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_000546.6(TP53):c.815T>A(p.Val272Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000546.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1
This variant is considered likely pathogenic. Functional studies indicate this variant impacts protein function [PMID: 29979965]. This variant is expected to disrupt protein structure [Myriad internal data]. -
Li-Fraumeni syndrome Uncertain:1
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects TP53 function (PMID: 12826609, 29979965, 30224644). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 12826609, 29979965, 30224644) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt TP53 function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 376673). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TP53-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 272 of the TP53 protein (p.Val272Glu). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at