17-7674292-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000546.6(TP53):c.673-2A>G variant causes a splice acceptor, intron change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000546.6 splice_acceptor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0;AS_VQSR AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1450522Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 722288
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1 Pathogenic:2
This variant is considered likely pathogenic. This variant occurs within a consensus splice junction and is predicted to result in abnormal mRNA splicing of either an out-of-frame exon or an in-frame exon necessary for protein stability and/or normal function. -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:2
The c.673-2A>G intronic pathogenic mutation results from an A to G substitution two nucleotides before coding exon 6 in the TP53 gene. This mutation, referred to as IVS6-2A>G, was described in a female patient diagnosed with five primary cancers before the age of 30 whose parents tested negative for this mutation (Jhaveri AP et al. Yale J Biol Med, 2015 Jun;88:181-5). This mutation was also reported in a female patient with ductal carcinoma in situ at age 39 whose 18 year-old daughter had two sarcomas (Heymann S et al. Radiat Oncol, 2010 Nov;5:104). In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will weaken the native splice acceptor site and will result in the creation or strengthening of a novel splice acceptor site. Published RNA studies have suggested that this variant disrupts mRNA splicing (Aspesi A et al. Gene, 2014 Jul;545:282-9; Senturk S et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014 Aug;111:E3287-96). In addition to the clinical data presented in the literature, alterations that disrupt the canonical splice site are expected to cause aberrant splicing, resulting in an abnormal protein or a transcript that is subject to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. As such, this alteration is classified as a disease-causing mutation. -
- -
not provided Pathogenic:1Other:1
- -
Canonical splice site variant demonstrated to result in an abnormal protein product or nonsense mediated mRNA decay in a gene for which loss-of-function is a known mechanism of disease (Aspesi 2014, Senturk 2014); Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28369373, 32658383, 26029016, 33063681, 31221207, 21059199, 27759562, 30720243, 25074920, 24835311, 25525159, 28472496) -
Li-Fraumeni syndrome Pathogenic:1
This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change affects an acceptor splice site in intron 6 of the TP53 gene. It is expected to disrupt RNA splicing. Variants that disrupt the donor or acceptor splice site typically lead to a loss of protein function (PMID: 16199547), and loss-of-function variants in TP53 are known to be pathogenic (PMID: 20522432). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 458555). Disruption of this splice site has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of Li-Fraumeni syndrome (PMID: 21059199, 26029016). In at least one individual the variant was observed to be de novo. -
Ovarian neoplasm Pathogenic:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at