17-7676154-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000546.6(TP53):​c.215C>G​(p.Pro72Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.708 in 1,613,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 411,964 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.63 ( 31776 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.72 ( 380188 hom. )

Consequence

TP53
NM_000546.6 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:1U:1B:27O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.44
Variant links:
Genes affected
TP53 (HGNC:11998): (tumor protein p53) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein containing transcriptional activation, DNA binding, and oligomerization domains. The encoded protein responds to diverse cellular stresses to regulate expression of target genes, thereby inducing cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence, DNA repair, or changes in metabolism. Mutations in this gene are associated with a variety of human cancers, including hereditary cancers such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Alternative splicing of this gene and the use of alternate promoters result in multiple transcript variants and isoforms. Additional isoforms have also been shown to result from the use of alternate translation initiation codons from identical transcript variants (PMIDs: 12032546, 20937277). [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=8.0827485E-6).
BP6
Variant 17-7676154-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-7676154-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 12351.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-7676154-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-7676154-G-C is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.74 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TP53NM_000546.6 linkc.215C>G p.Pro72Arg missense_variant Exon 4 of 11 ENST00000269305.9 NP_000537.3 P04637-1K7PPA8Q53GA5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TP53ENST00000269305.9 linkc.215C>G p.Pro72Arg missense_variant Exon 4 of 11 1 NM_000546.6 ENSP00000269305.4 P04637-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.627
AC:
95293
AN:
151904
Hom.:
31786
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.388
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.670
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.699
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.721
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.577
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.521
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.736
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.662
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.745
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.660
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.668
AC:
167398
AN:
250534
Hom.:
57557
AF XY:
0.664
AC XY:
90173
AN XY:
135746
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.380
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.715
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.715
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.570
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.500
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.730
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.738
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.698
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.716
AC:
1046941
AN:
1461558
Hom.:
380188
Cov.:
80
AF XY:
0.710
AC XY:
516401
AN XY:
727064
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.376
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.714
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.719
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.605
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.507
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.733
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.748
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.695
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.627
AC:
95285
AN:
152024
Hom.:
31776
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.625
AC XY:
46413
AN XY:
74294
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.387
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.700
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.721
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.576
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.523
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.736
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.745
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.652
Alfa
AF:
0.714
Hom.:
27610
Bravo
AF:
0.617
TwinsUK
AF:
0.755
AC:
2801
ALSPAC
AF:
0.750
AC:
2889
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.405
AC:
1784
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.745
AC:
6409
ExAC
AF:
0.659
AC:
79937
Asia WGS
AF:
0.514
AC:
1788
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.750
EpiControl
AF:
0.745

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Benign:27Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7Other:1
Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 05, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:5
Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 01, 2019
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 24, 2014
Pathway Genomics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 18, 2017
IntelligeneCG
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 18, 2022
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17719241, 22289634, 23729685, 22703879, 18990008, 22524816, 20128691, 12459171, 19657731, 15138483, 21323870, 18426989, 15183530, 20587514, 18256523, 19789321, 15131588, 19837266, 18567547, 23210739, 22189267, 21038427, 20019240, 23073555, 20939739, 19357867, 19521721, 20886596, 21931130, 21454683, 21814224, 22336889, 19542078, 16258005, 11983757, 19657586, 11844595, 22367371, 21245379, 9891044, 17403527, 18583979, 12567188, 19171829, 19165225, 19639206, 21124037, 23207172, 21778786, 24728327, 21283750, 22545084, 24747975, 12826609, 19470478, 8625447, 23793604, 27153395, 25896519, 15609317, 23683469, 9607760) -

Nov 27, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Nov 05, 2014
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 02, 2020
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 18, 2022
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Li-Fraumeni syndrome Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 03, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2021
Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Lip and oral cavity carcinoma Pathogenic:1
Apr 30, 2019
Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

TP53 POLYMORPHISM Benign:1
Oct 01, 2009
OMIM
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

Choroid plexus papilloma;C0235974:Carcinoma of pancreas;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C0585442:Bone osteosarcoma;C1835398:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1;C1859972:Adrenocortical carcinoma, hereditary;C2239176:Hepatocellular carcinoma;C2750850:Glioma susceptibility 1;C2931822:Nasopharyngeal carcinoma;C3553606:Basal cell carcinoma, susceptibility to, 7;C4748488:Bone marrow failure syndrome 5 Benign:1
Dec 20, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Acute myeloid leukemia Benign:1
-
Dr. Afia Zoology Lab, University of Education
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Neoplasm Other:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: -
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.072
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.33
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.11
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.57
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.013
T;T;.;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.88
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.95
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.36
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.44
T;T;.;.;.;T;T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000081
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
.;.;.;L;.;L;L;L;.;.;L;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.40
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.29
N;N;.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.;N;.;.;N;.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.37
Sift
Benign
0.26
T;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;T;.;.;T;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.57
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.;T;.
Polyphen
0.74
P;.;.;B;.;B;B;B;.;.;B;.;.;B;.;.
Vest4
0.16
MPC
0.81
ClinPred
0.0069
T
GERP RS
1.9
Varity_R
0.086
gMVP
0.21

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1042522; hg19: chr17-7579472; COSMIC: COSV52666208; COSMIC: COSV52666208; API