17-7676196-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000546.6(TP53):c.173C>G(p.Pro58Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000384 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P58T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000546.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast cancerInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- Li-Fraumeni syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
- Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
- adrenocortical carcinoma, hereditaryInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- bone marrow failure syndrome 5Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- colorectal cancerInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- choroid plexus carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000546.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP53 | NM_000546.6 | MANE Select | c.173C>G | p.Pro58Arg | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | NP_000537.3 | ||
| TP53 | NM_001126112.3 | c.173C>G | p.Pro58Arg | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | NP_001119584.1 | |||
| TP53 | NM_001407262.1 | c.173C>G | p.Pro58Arg | missense | Exon 5 of 12 | NP_001394191.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP53 | ENST00000269305.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.173C>G | p.Pro58Arg | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | ENSP00000269305.4 | ||
| TP53 | ENST00000445888.6 | TSL:1 | c.173C>G | p.Pro58Arg | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | ENSP00000391478.2 | ||
| TP53 | ENST00000610292.4 | TSL:1 | c.56C>G | p.Pro19Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 10 | ENSP00000478219.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000270 AC: 41AN: 152096Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000796 AC: 20AN: 251224 AF XY: 0.0000368 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000144 AC: 21AN: 1461838Hom.: 0 Cov.: 59 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 727226 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000269 AC: 41AN: 152214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 18AN XY: 74410 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1 Uncertain:2
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.
This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk.
not provided Benign:2
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 27978560, 28528518, 12826609, 27443514)
not specified Benign:1Other:1
Variant summary: TP53 c.173C>G (p.Pro58Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the transactivation domain 2 (IPR040926) of the encoded protein sequence. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-05 in 251224 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00099 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 25 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TP53 causing Li-Fraumeni Syndrome phenotype (4e-05). c.173C>G has been observed in individual(s) affected with Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Sehn_2014). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 24451277). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127804). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.
Li-Fraumeni syndrome Benign:1
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
TP53-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at