17-7676230-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000546.6(TP53):c.139C>A(p.Pro47Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000031 in 1,613,966 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P47P) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000546.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP53 | NM_000546.6 | c.139C>A | p.Pro47Thr | missense_variant | 4/11 | ENST00000269305.9 | NP_000537.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TP53 | ENST00000269305.9 | c.139C>A | p.Pro47Thr | missense_variant | 4/11 | 1 | NM_000546.6 | ENSP00000269305.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152084Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 59 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152084Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74302
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine | Apr 12, 2024 | Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).For TP53, we used the output of the Naïve Bayes classifier that synthesized data from four different TP53 MAVEs in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697). If the classifier predicted a variant to be "Functionally abnormal," the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. If a variant was predicted to be "Functionally normal," BS3_moderate evidence was used with no PS3 evidence. This variant GRCh38:17:7676230:G>T was assigned evidence codes ['BS3_Moderate', 'BP4'] and an overall classification of Likely benign - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 19, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 18, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 28, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Li-Fraumeni syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 01, 2023 | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 47 of the TP53 protein (p.Pro47Thr). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.01%). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect TP53 function (PMID: 12826609, 30224644). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 12826609, 29979965, 30224644) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt TP53 function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 406608). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TP53-related conditions. - |
Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jun 18, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at