17-7689242-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001143992.2(WRAP53):​c.450C>T​(p.Phe150Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0979 in 1,613,714 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,873 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 1982 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.094 ( 8891 hom. )

Consequence

WRAP53
NM_001143992.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.513

Publications

44 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
WRAP53 (HGNC:25522): (WD repeat containing antisense to TP53) This gene encodes an essential component of the telomerase holoenzyme complex, a ribonucleoprotein complex required for telomere synthesis. This protein is enriched in Cajal bodies, nuclear sites of RNP processing that are important for telomerase function. It interacts with dyskerin, TERT and TERC, other components of active telomerase, and with small Cajal body RNAs (scaRNAs), which are involved in modifying splicing RNAs. This mRNA also functions as a p53 antisense transcript, that regulates endogenous p53 mRNA levels and further induction of p53 protein by targeting the 5' untranslated region of p53 mRNA. Alternatively spliced transcript variants which differ only in the 5' UTR have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]
WRAP53 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • dyskeratosis congenita
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 17-7689242-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-7689242-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 261003.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.513 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.292 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
WRAP53NM_001143992.2 linkc.450C>T p.Phe150Phe synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 11 ENST00000396463.7 NP_001137464.1
WRAP53NM_001143990.2 linkc.450C>T p.Phe150Phe synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 11 NP_001137462.1
WRAP53NM_001143991.2 linkc.450C>T p.Phe150Phe synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 11 NP_001137463.1
WRAP53NM_018081.2 linkc.450C>T p.Phe150Phe synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 10 NP_060551.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
WRAP53ENST00000396463.7 linkc.450C>T p.Phe150Phe synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 11 1 NM_001143992.2 ENSP00000379727.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.139
AC:
21144
AN:
151774
Hom.:
1980
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.247
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0560
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.140
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0807
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.304
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.213
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0471
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0791
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0757
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.123
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.130
AC:
32768
AN:
251470
AF XY:
0.130
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.250
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.152
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0788
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.308
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0453
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0755
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0989
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0935
AC:
136744
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
8891
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0967
AC XY:
70342
AN XY:
727226
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.251
AC:
8392
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.149
AC:
6683
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0783
AC:
2045
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.284
AC:
11282
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.218
AC:
18812
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0467
AC:
2496
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0922
AC:
532
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0718
AC:
79827
AN:
1111968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.111
AC:
6675
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.466
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7608
15217
22825
30434
38042
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3282
6564
9846
13128
16410
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.139
AC:
21164
AN:
151892
Hom.:
1982
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.140
AC XY:
10388
AN XY:
74256
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.247
AC:
10195
AN:
41350
American (AMR)
AF:
0.140
AC:
2128
AN:
15248
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0807
AC:
280
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.304
AC:
1565
AN:
5146
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.212
AC:
1011
AN:
4776
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0471
AC:
500
AN:
10608
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0816
AC:
24
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0757
AC:
5147
AN:
67982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.125
AC:
263
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
816
1633
2449
3266
4082
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
234
468
702
936
1170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0968
Hom.:
3953
Bravo
AF:
0.148
Asia WGS
AF:
0.251
AC:
869
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Jan 24, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 24% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 23. Only high quality variants are reported. -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jul 09, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive 3 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 22, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Li-Fraumeni syndrome Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:1
Oct 08, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
8.0
DANN
Benign
0.71
PhyloP100
-0.51
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2287498; hg19: chr17-7592560; COSMIC: COSV52807243; COSMIC: COSV52807243; API