17-78131665-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_152468.5(TMC8):c.77T>C(p.Met26Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0315 in 1,568,410 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,013 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M26L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_152468.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- epidermodysplasia verruciformis, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- epidermodysplasia verruciformisInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMC8 | NM_152468.5 | c.77T>C | p.Met26Thr | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 16 | ENST00000318430.10 | NP_689681.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0238 AC: 3630AN: 152218Hom.: 83 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0321 AC: 5477AN: 170648 AF XY: 0.0353 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0324 AC: 45814AN: 1416076Hom.: 931 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0339 AC XY: 23745AN XY: 700296 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0238 AC: 3628AN: 152334Hom.: 82 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0240 AC XY: 1788AN XY: 74490 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Epidermodysplasia verruciformis Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at