17-78188386-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001010982.5(AFMID):c.63+953G>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000132 in 152,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001010982.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001010982.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFMID | NM_001010982.5 | MANE Select | c.63+953G>C | intron | N/A | NP_001010982.2 | |||
| AFMID | NM_001145526.3 | c.63+953G>C | intron | N/A | NP_001138998.1 | ||||
| AFMID | NM_001391999.1 | c.63+953G>C | intron | N/A | NP_001378928.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFMID | ENST00000409257.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.63+953G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000386890.4 | |||
| AFMID | ENST00000327898.9 | TSL:1 | c.63+953G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000328938.5 | |||
| AFMID | ENST00000589256.5 | TSL:1 | c.63+953G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000466859.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152056Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152056Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74262 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at