17-78532708-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_173628.4(DNAH17):c.2888T>C(p.Ile963Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.514 in 1,590,510 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 211,095 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173628.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH17 | NM_173628.4 | c.2888T>C | p.Ile963Thr | missense_variant | Exon 20 of 81 | ENST00000389840.7 | NP_775899.3 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.506 AC: 76780AN: 151748Hom.: 19642 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.481 AC: 104088AN: 216402 AF XY: 0.485 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.514 AC: 740145AN: 1438644Hom.: 191444 Cov.: 48 AF XY: 0.513 AC XY: 365806AN XY: 713286 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.506 AC: 76821AN: 151866Hom.: 19651 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.502 AC XY: 37239AN XY: 74210 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency
DNAH17-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at