17-80048579-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):c.677-4C>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.237 in 1,611,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 47,727 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017950.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC40 | NM_017950.4 | c.677-4C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000397545.9 | NP_060420.2 | |||
CCDC40 | NM_001243342.2 | c.677-4C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001230271.1 | ||||
CCDC40 | NM_001330508.2 | c.677-4C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001317437.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC40 | ENST00000397545.9 | c.677-4C>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 5 | NM_017950.4 | ENSP00000380679.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.196 AC: 29788AN: 152026Hom.: 3583 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.238 AC: 58601AN: 245724Hom.: 7656 AF XY: 0.235 AC XY: 31392AN XY: 133758
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.242 AC: 352656AN: 1458856Hom.: 44139 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.241 AC XY: 174974AN XY: 725898
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.196 AC: 29808AN: 152144Hom.: 3588 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.199 AC XY: 14798AN XY: 74374
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 21, 2013 | 677-4C>G in intron 4 of CCDC40: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus seque nce. It has been identified in 23.3% (1932/8296) of European American chromosome s from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.w ashington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2289530). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 08, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 05, 2018 | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 15 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at