17-80095330-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):c.2900G>T(p.Arg967Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00489 in 1,614,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 355 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R967H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017950.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC40 | NM_017950.4 | c.2900G>T | p.Arg967Leu | missense_variant | 18/20 | ENST00000397545.9 | NP_060420.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC40 | ENST00000397545.9 | c.2900G>T | p.Arg967Leu | missense_variant | 18/20 | 5 | NM_017950.4 | ENSP00000380679.4 | ||
CCDC40 | ENST00000574799.5 | n.2437G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 14/16 | 1 | |||||
CCDC40 | ENST00000572253.5 | n.3151G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/6 | 2 | |||||
CCDC40 | ENST00000575431.1 | n.544G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0253 AC: 3859AN: 152238Hom.: 178 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00655 AC: 1632AN: 249080Hom.: 78 AF XY: 0.00488 AC XY: 660AN XY: 135310
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00274 AC: 4000AN: 1461708Hom.: 171 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00244 AC XY: 1774AN XY: 727160
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0255 AC: 3887AN: 152354Hom.: 184 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0246 AC XY: 1831AN XY: 74512
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 12, 2015 | p.Arg967Leu in exon 18 of CCDC40: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance it has been identified in 8.8% (861/9720) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP r s61686936). - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 02, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 09, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31213628) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 15 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at