17-80210594-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000199.5(SGSH):​c.1367G>A​(p.Arg456His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.337 in 1,612,796 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 93,725 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R456C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.32 ( 7950 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.34 ( 85775 hom. )

Consequence

SGSH
NM_000199.5 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.459

Publications

64 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SGSH (HGNC:10818): (N-sulfoglucosamine sulfohydrolase) This gene encodes the enzyme sulfamidase; one of several enzymes involved in the lysosomal degradation of heparan sulfate. Mutations in this gene are associated with the lysosomal storage disease mucopolysaccaridosis IIIA, also known as Sanfilippo syndrome A, which results from impaired degradation of heparan sulfate. Transcripts of varying sizes have been reported but their biological validity has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]
CARD14 (HGNC:16446): (caspase recruitment domain family member 14) This gene encodes a caspase recruitment domain-containing protein that is a member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family of proteins. Members of this protein family are scaffold proteins that are involved in a diverse array of cellular processes including cellular adhesion, signal transduction and cell polarity control. This protein has been shown to specifically interact with BCL10, a protein known to function as a positive regulator of cell apoptosis and NF-kappaB activation. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
CARD14 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial pityriasis rubra pilaris
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • psoriasis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=3.778287E-5).
BP6
Variant 17-80210594-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80210594-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 92610.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.437 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000199.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SGSH
NM_000199.5
MANE Select
c.1367G>Ap.Arg456His
missense
Exon 8 of 8NP_000190.1
SGSH
NR_148201.2
n.1281G>A
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 7 of 7
SGSH
NM_001352921.3
c.*454G>A
3_prime_UTR
Exon 8 of 8NP_001339850.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SGSH
ENST00000326317.11
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1367G>Ap.Arg456His
missense
Exon 8 of 8ENSP00000314606.6
SGSH
ENST00000575282.5
TSL:1
n.4250G>A
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 5 of 5
SGSH
ENST00000573150.5
TSL:2
n.*577G>A
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 7 of 7ENSP00000459280.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.316
AC:
47998
AN:
151848
Hom.:
7937
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.220
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.200
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.445
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.355
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.401
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.402
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.340
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.328
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.342
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.369
AC:
91556
AN:
248374
AF XY:
0.364
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.214
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.538
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.353
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.422
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.352
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.327
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.355
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.339
AC:
495325
AN:
1460830
Hom.:
85775
Cov.:
54
AF XY:
0.341
AC XY:
247653
AN XY:
726716
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.212
AC:
7086
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.528
AC:
23571
AN:
44600
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.356
AC:
9299
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.338
AC:
13390
AN:
39662
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.394
AC:
33980
AN:
86226
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.352
AC:
18582
AN:
52858
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.336
AC:
1938
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.330
AC:
366799
AN:
1111754
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.343
AC:
20680
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23126
46251
69377
92502
115628
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
11970
23940
35910
47880
59850
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.316
AC:
48039
AN:
151966
Hom.:
7950
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.321
AC XY:
23802
AN XY:
74254
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.219
AC:
9097
AN:
41446
American (AMR)
AF:
0.446
AC:
6816
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.355
AC:
1231
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.401
AC:
2063
AN:
5150
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.402
AC:
1931
AN:
4804
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.340
AC:
3597
AN:
10566
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.330
AC:
97
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.328
AC:
22305
AN:
67938
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.342
AC:
720
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1600
3201
4801
6402
8002
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.328
Hom.:
38131
Bravo
AF:
0.321
TwinsUK
AF:
0.331
AC:
1228
ALSPAC
AF:
0.316
AC:
1216
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.221
AC:
973
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.331
AC:
2850
ExAC
AF:
0.354
AC:
42908
Asia WGS
AF:
0.378
AC:
1316
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.332
EpiControl
AF:
0.335

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Mucopolysaccharidosis, MPS-III-A Benign:5
Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:4
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 23, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:4
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 22, 2015
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 05, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The SGSH c.1367G>A (p.Arg456His) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 2/3 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 42217/117544 control chromosomes (including 7750 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.3591591, which is approximately 111 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SGSH variant (0.0032275), suggesting this variant is a common benign polymorphism. In addition, clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases have classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.096
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.67
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
CADD
Benign
0.89
DANN
Benign
0.92
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.24
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.7
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.046
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.57
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.000038
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.9
L
PhyloP100
-0.46
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.26
N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.19
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.026
MPC
0.24
ClinPred
0.0039
T
GERP RS
-6.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.036
gMVP
0.56
Mutation Taster
=71/29
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7503034; hg19: chr17-78184393; COSMIC: COSV58338728; COSMIC: COSV58338728; API