17-81510792-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP7
The NM_001614.5(ACTG1):c.1026T>G(p.Gly342Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G342G) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001614.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Baraitser-winter syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 20Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Baraitser-Winter cerebrofrontofacial syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACTG1 | NM_001614.5 | c.1026T>G | p.Gly342Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 6 | ENST00000573283.7 | NP_001605.1 | |
ACTG1 | NM_001199954.3 | c.1026T>G | p.Gly342Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 6 | NP_001186883.1 | ||
ACTG1 | NR_037688.3 | n.1098T>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 6 of 7 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at