17-81933146-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006907.4(PYCR1):c.*68C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00143 in 1,608,588 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006907.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYCR1 | NM_006907.4 | c.*68C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 7 of 7 | ENST00000329875.13 | NP_008838.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00687 AC: 1045AN: 152216Hom.: 11 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000857 AC: 1248AN: 1456254Hom.: 16 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000720 AC XY: 522AN XY: 724504
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00693 AC: 1055AN: 152334Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00662 AC XY: 493AN XY: 74492
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
- -
Cutis laxa Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at