17-8228329-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_025099.6(CTC1):c.3515-10C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000658 in 152,074 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_025099.6 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cerebroretinal microangiopathy with calcifications and cysts 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
- dyskeratosis congenitaInheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
- Coats plus syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTC1 | NM_025099.6 | c.3515-10C>G | intron_variant | Intron 22 of 22 | ENST00000651323.1 | NP_079375.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTC1 | ENST00000651323.1 | c.3515-10C>G | intron_variant | Intron 22 of 22 | NM_025099.6 | ENSP00000498499.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152074Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000401 AC: 1AN: 249324 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152074Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74282 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at