18-22200698-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The ENST00000269216.10(GATA6):āc.1663C>Gā(p.Pro555Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000224 in 1,614,226 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P555P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000269216.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GATA6 | NM_005257.6 | c.1663C>G | p.Pro555Ala | missense_variant | 7/7 | ENST00000269216.10 | NP_005248.2 | |
GATA6 | XM_047437483.1 | c.1663C>G | p.Pro555Ala | missense_variant | 7/7 | XP_047293439.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GATA6 | ENST00000269216.10 | c.1663C>G | p.Pro555Ala | missense_variant | 7/7 | 1 | NM_005257.6 | ENSP00000269216 | P1 | |
GATA6 | ENST00000581694.1 | c.1663C>G | p.Pro555Ala | missense_variant | 6/6 | 1 | ENSP00000462313 | P1 | ||
ENST00000583442.1 | n.691G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000177 AC: 27AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000247 AC: 62AN: 251360Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000191 AC XY: 26AN XY: 135880
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000229 AC: 335AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 156AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000177 AC: 27AN: 152334Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74490
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 01, 2020 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28381408) - |
Tetralogy of Fallot;C1857586:Conotruncal heart malformations;C2931296:Pancreatic hypoplasia-diabetes-congenital heart disease syndrome;C3280939:Atrioventricular septal defect 5;C3280943:Atrial septal defect 9 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Mar 30, 2021 | GATA6 NM_005257.5 exon 7 p.Pro555Ala (c.1663C>G): This variant has not been reported in the literature and is present in 0.1% (44/35438) of Latino alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/18-19780661-C-G). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:412726). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools suggest that this variant may not impact the protein. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 07, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Atrioventricular septal defect 5 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at