Menu
GeneBe

18-23544981-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000271.5(NPC1):c.1926G>C(p.Met642Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.687 in 1,530,962 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 374,159 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Benignin ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M642T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.74 ( 40038 hom., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.68 ( 334121 hom. )

Consequence

NPC1
NM_000271.5 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.90
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPC1 (HGNC:7897): (NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1) This gene encodes a large protein that resides in the limiting membrane of endosomes and lysosomes and mediates intracellular cholesterol trafficking via binding of cholesterol to its N-terminal domain. It is predicted to have a cytoplasmic C-terminus, 13 transmembrane domains, and 3 large loops in the lumen of the endosome - the last loop being at the N-terminus. This protein transports low-density lipoproteins to late endosomal/lysosomal compartments where they are hydrolized and released as free cholesterol. Defects in this gene cause Niemann-Pick type C disease, a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by over accumulation of cholesterol and glycosphingolipids in late endosomal/lysosomal compartments.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 4 uncertain in NM_000271.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.0263868E-6).
BP6
Variant 18-23544981-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-23544981-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 92701.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr18-23544981-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.901 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NPC1NM_000271.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1926G>C p.Met642Ile missense_variant 12/25 ENST00000269228.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NPC1ENST00000269228.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1926G>C p.Met642Ile missense_variant 12/251 NM_000271.5 P1O15118-1
NPC1ENST00000591051.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1005G>C p.Met335Ile missense_variant 5/182
NPC1ENST00000540608.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.1840G>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 10/162

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.740
AC:
104617
AN:
141462
Hom.:
39989
Cov.:
22
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.909
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.719
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.744
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.579
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.923
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.761
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.604
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.644
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.650
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.698
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.729
AC:
174136
AN:
238838
Hom.:
66404
AF XY:
0.720
AC XY:
93040
AN XY:
129148
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.924
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.828
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.578
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.935
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.768
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.659
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.653
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.693
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.682
AC:
947164
AN:
1389384
Hom.:
334121
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.682
AC XY:
470282
AN XY:
689718
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.921
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.821
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.575
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.944
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.768
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.660
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.655
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.694
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.740
AC:
104728
AN:
141578
Hom.:
40038
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.739
AC XY:
50240
AN XY:
67968
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.909
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.744
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.579
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.922
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.760
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.604
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.650
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.701
Alfa
AF:
0.659
Hom.:
22488
Bravo
AF:
0.763
TwinsUK
AF:
0.655
AC:
2427
ALSPAC
AF:
0.645
AC:
2484
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.910
AC:
4008
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.645
AC:
5547
ExAC
AF:
0.718
AC:
87148
Asia WGS
AF:
0.844
AC:
2934
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterApr 22, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJun 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsAug 11, 2021- -
not specified Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 21, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23153210) -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 23, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.079
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.47
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
Cadd
Benign
16
Dann
Benign
0.77
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.24
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.69
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.36
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.22
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.29
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000010
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-2.1
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Benign
1.6
N
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Benign
1.0
T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.10
MutPred
0.24
Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1764);
MPC
0.28
ClinPred
0.0077
T
GERP RS
5.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.15
gMVP
0.19

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1788799; hg19: chr18-21124945; API