18-23890029-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_198129.4(LAMA3):​c.5322C>T​(p.Phe1774Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0369 in 1,613,238 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,839 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.082 ( 1064 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.032 ( 2775 hom. )

Consequence

LAMA3
NM_198129.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.939

Publications

14 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LAMA3 (HGNC:6483): (laminin subunit alpha 3) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the laminin family of secreted molecules. Laminins are heterotrimeric molecules that consist of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits that assemble through a coiled-coil domain. Laminins are essential for formation and function of the basement membrane and have additional functions in regulating cell migration and mechanical signal transduction. This gene encodes an alpha subunit and is responsive to several epithelial-mesenchymal regulators including keratinocyte growth factor, epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor. Mutations in this gene have been identified as the cause of Herlitz type junctional epidermolysis bullosa and laryngoonychocutaneous syndrome. Alternative splicing and alternative promoter usage result in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]
LAMA3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • junctional epidermolysis bullosa
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health
  • laryngo-onycho-cutaneous syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • junctional epidermolysis bullosa Herlitz type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
  • junctional epidermolysis bullosa, non-Herlitz type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
  • generalized junctional epidermolysis bullosa non-Herlitz type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).
BP6
Variant 18-23890029-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-23890029-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 255581.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.939 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.181 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LAMA3NM_198129.4 linkc.5322C>T p.Phe1774Phe synonymous_variant Exon 42 of 75 ENST00000313654.14 NP_937762.2
LAMA3NM_000227.6 linkc.495C>T p.Phe165Phe synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 38 ENST00000269217.11 NP_000218.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LAMA3ENST00000313654.14 linkc.5322C>T p.Phe1774Phe synonymous_variant Exon 42 of 75 1 NM_198129.4 ENSP00000324532.8
LAMA3ENST00000269217.11 linkc.495C>T p.Phe165Phe synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 38 1 NM_000227.6 ENSP00000269217.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0817
AC:
12430
AN:
152064
Hom.:
1055
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.184
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.119
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.177
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0652
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0425
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0153
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0166
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0632
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0705
AC:
17717
AN:
251394
AF XY:
0.0589
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.190
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.271
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0607
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0195
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0167
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0503
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0322
AC:
47015
AN:
1461056
Hom.:
2775
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0310
AC XY:
22506
AN XY:
726906
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.190
AC:
6340
AN:
33418
American (AMR)
AF:
0.259
AC:
11561
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0149
AC:
390
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0686
AC:
2722
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0453
AC:
3909
AN:
86224
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
1138
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
123
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0167
AC:
18506
AN:
1111322
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0385
AC:
2326
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.452
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2319
4639
6958
9278
11597
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0820
AC:
12481
AN:
152182
Hom.:
1064
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0838
AC XY:
6232
AN XY:
74392
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.184
AC:
7641
AN:
41502
American (AMR)
AF:
0.178
AC:
2716
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0107
AC:
37
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0652
AC:
337
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0433
AC:
209
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0153
AC:
162
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0272
AC:
8
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0166
AC:
1129
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0634
AC:
134
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
523
1046
1570
2093
2616
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
124
248
372
496
620
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0432
Hom.:
176
Bravo
AF:
0.101
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0690
AC:
240
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0146
EpiControl
AF:
0.0159

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Nov 02, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:2
May 16, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: LAMA3 c.495C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.07 in 251394 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.27 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1412 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 597 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in LAMA3 causing Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa phenotype (0.00045), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.495C>T in individuals affected with Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Mar 04, 2016
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Laryngo-onycho-cutaneous syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa gravis of Herlitz Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Benign
6.6
DANN
Benign
0.84
PhyloP100
0.94
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs958631; hg19: chr18-21469993; COSMIC: COSV52535427; API