18-2925366-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001375808.2(LPIN2):c.1796C>T(p.Pro599Leu) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,613,896 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001375808.2 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPIN2 | NM_001375808.2 | c.1796C>T | p.Pro599Leu | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 14/20 | ENST00000677752.1 | NP_001362737.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPIN2 | ENST00000677752.1 | c.1796C>T | p.Pro599Leu | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 14/20 | NM_001375808.2 | ENSP00000504857 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152074Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000517 AC: 13AN: 251448Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000442 AC XY: 6AN XY: 135898
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000171 AC: 25AN: 1461822Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152074Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000808 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74284
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Majeed syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 30, 2022 | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 599 of the LPIN2 protein (p.Pro599Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs372850864, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with systemic auto-inflammatory diseases (PMID: 26386126). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 326636). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The leucine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 17, 2017 | The P599L variant has been observed in a patient with an auto-inflammatory disorder; however that patient had another previously-observed variant which was unspecified (Rusmini et al., 2015). The variant is not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). P599L is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved. However, in silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. In summary, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | May 08, 2018 | The LPIN2 c.1796C>T;p.Pro599Leu variant (rs372850864) has been described in the medical literature in at least one individual with a clinical diagnosis of systemic auto-inflammatory disease (Rusmini 2016). The variant is listed in the ClinVar database (Variation ID: 326636) and in the Genome Aggregation Database in 14 out of 277170 alleles, indicating it is not a common polymorphism. The proline at this position is moderately conserved across species and computational algorithms (PolyPhen-2, SIFT) predict this variant is tolerated. Considering available information, there is insufficient evidence to classify this variant with certainty. If this variant is later determined to be pathogenic, this variant individual may be a carrier of Majeed syndrome (OMIM#605519). References: Rusmini M et al. Next-generation sequencing and its initial applications for molecular diagnosis of systemic auto-inflammatory diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Aug;75(8):1550-7. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at