18-31536328-C-T

Position:

chr18-31536328-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001943.5(DSG2):c.1550C>T(p.Ala517Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00031 in 1,614,190 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

DSG2
NM_001943.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.44

Variant links:

Genes affected

DSG2 (HGNC:3049): (desmoglein 2) This gene encodes a member of the desmoglein family and cadherin cell adhesion molecule superfamily of proteins. Desmogleins are calcium-binding transmembrane glycoprotein components of desmosomes, cell-cell junctions between epithelial, myocardial, and other cell types. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other desmoglein gene family members on chromosome 18. Mutations in this gene have been associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, familial, 10. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

DSG2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018125117).

BP6

Variant 18-31536328-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-31536328-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163210.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}. Variant chr18-31536328-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr18-31536328-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00166 (253/152312) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00587 (244/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00527. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 108 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 253 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DSG2	NM_001943.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.1550C>T	p.Ala517Val	missense_variant	11/15	ENST00000261590.13	NP_001934.2	Q14126
DSG2	XM_047437315.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.1016C>T	p.Ala339Val	missense_variant	12/16		XP_047293271.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DSG2	ENST00000261590.13 linkuse as main transcript	c.1550C>T	p.Ala517Val	missense_variant	11/15	1	NM_001943.5	ENSP00000261590.8		Q14126

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00166

AC:

252

AN:

152194

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00586

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000421

AC:

105

AN:

249452

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000281

AC XY:

AN XY:

135326

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00600

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000884

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000170

AC:

248

AN:

1461878

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

727242

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00585

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000313

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000464

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00166

AC:

253

AN:

152312

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00145

AC XY:

108

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00587

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.000319

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00229

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00535

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000571

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute	Mar 01, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Mar 23, 2015	p.Ala517Val in exon 11 of DSG2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.7% (65/9800) of African chromosom es by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; db SNP rs200509948). -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	research	Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health	Jun 24, 2013	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Sep 25, 2017	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Nov 21, 2021	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 10

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Apr 27, 2017	This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Nov 16, 2018

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Clinical Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital

Jan 02, 2019

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jun 03, 2015

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.40

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.062

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.14

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.27

Eigen

Uncertain

0.40

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.35

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.93

LIST_S2

Benign

0.78

M_CAP

Benign

0.067

MetaRNN

Benign

0.018

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.54

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.7

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.50

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.7

REVEL

Uncertain

0.33

Sift

Benign

0.37

Sift4G

Benign

0.074

Polyphen

0.99

Vest4

0.80

MVP

0.84

MPC

0.42

ClinPred

0.031

GERP RS

5.9

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.15

gMVP

0.86

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over