Menu
GeneBe

18-31538880-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001943.5(DSG2):c.1781T>C(p.Leu594Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000354 in 1,614,194 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L594L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DSG2
NM_001943.5 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.85
Variant links:
Genes affected
DSG2 (HGNC:3049): (desmoglein 2) This gene encodes a member of the desmoglein family and cadherin cell adhesion molecule superfamily of proteins. Desmogleins are calcium-binding transmembrane glycoprotein components of desmosomes, cell-cell junctions between epithelial, myocardial, and other cell types. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other desmoglein gene family members on chromosome 18. Mutations in this gene have been associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, familial, 10. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0063305497).
BP6
Variant 18-31538880-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-31538880-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 44287.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=9, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr18-31538880-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr18-31538880-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 57 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DSG2NM_001943.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1781T>C p.Leu594Pro missense_variant 12/15 ENST00000261590.13
DSG2XM_047437315.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1247T>C p.Leu416Pro missense_variant 13/16

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DSG2ENST00000261590.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.1781T>C p.Leu594Pro missense_variant 12/151 NM_001943.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000375
AC:
57
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00922
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000630
AC:
157
AN:
249162
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000636
AC XY:
86
AN XY:
135160
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00964
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000948
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000159
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000661
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000352
AC:
514
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000380
AC XY:
276
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000268
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00957
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000893
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000745
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000374
AC:
57
AN:
152320
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000376
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00922
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000830
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000642
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000408
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000472
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
0.000553
AC:
67
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 04, 2023Variant summary: DSG2 c.1781T>C (p.Leu594Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00063 in 249162 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency is approximately 2.52 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DSG2 causing Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.00025), suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1781T>C has been reported in the literature in a heterozygous individual affected with Brugada syndrome (e.g. DiResta_2015) and in a case of sudden infant death syndrome reported as a VUS (e.g. Neubauer_2017). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 26220970, 21636032, 28074886). Twelve submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, classifying the variant as benign (n=3), likely benign (n=8), or uncertain significance (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 22, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineAug 27, 2014Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Leu594Pro varia nt in DSG2 has been identified in 4/8470 European American chromosomes by the NH LBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs19968190 1). Our laboratory has previously detected this variant in 3 individuals (1 Asia n child with HCM and WPW, 1 Ashkenazi Jewish adult with possible DCM/ARVC, and 1 Ashkenazi Jewish adult with HCM). Leucine (Leu) at position 594 is not conserve d in mammals or evolutionarily distant species, raising the possibility that a c hange at this position may be tolerated. Additional computational prediction too ls suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, while the clini cal significance of the Leu594Pro variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign. -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2024DSG2: BP4 -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioAug 20, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthAug 14, 2018- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 10 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 11, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San DiegoApr 06, 2018- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 07, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
DSG2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 13, 2024This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.26
Cadd
Benign
19
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.089
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.054
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.031
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.80
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.48
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.044
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0063
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.37
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.18
N
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Benign
0.10
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.24
T
Polyphen
0.93
P
Vest4
0.49
MVP
0.64
MPC
0.43
ClinPred
0.074
T
GERP RS
4.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.41
gMVP
0.77

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199681901; hg19: chr18-29118843; API