18-31546745-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001943.5(DSG2):c.*2C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00105 in 1,613,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DSG2
NM_001943.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.277

Variant links:

Genes affected

DSG2 (HGNC:3049): (desmoglein 2) This gene encodes a member of the desmoglein family and cadherin cell adhesion molecule superfamily of proteins. Desmogleins are calcium-binding transmembrane glycoprotein components of desmosomes, cell-cell junctions between epithelial, myocardial, and other cell types. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other desmoglein gene family members on chromosome 18. Mutations in this gene have been associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, familial, 10. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

DSG2 links:

DSG2-AS1 (HGNC:51311): (DSG2 antisense RNA 1)

DSG2-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).

BP6

Variant 18-31546745-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-31546745-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163229.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1}. Variant chr18-31546745-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000656 (100/152336) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00332 (16/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00208. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 49 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 100 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DSG2	NM_001943.5 link	c.*2C>T	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 15 of 15	ENST00000261590.13	NP_001934.2	Q14126
DSG2	XM_047437315.1 link	c.*2C>T	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 16 of 16		XP_047293271.1
DSG2-AS1	NR_045216.1 link	n.1346-839G>A	intron_variant	Intron 3 of 5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DSG2	ENST00000261590.13 link	c.*2C>T	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 15 of 15	1	NM_001943.5	ENSP00000261590.8	Q14126
DSG2-AS1	ENST00000583706.5 link	n.1384-839G>A	intron_variant	Intron 3 of 5	5
DSG2-AS1	ENST00000657343.1 link	n.697-839G>A	intron_variant	Intron 3 of 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000657

AC:

100

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00331

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000897

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000908

AC:

226

AN:

248922

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00103

AC XY:

139

AN XY:

135124

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000753

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00169

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00242

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000931

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000661

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00109

AC:

1593

AN:

1461426

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00115

AC XY:

836

AN XY:

727056

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000827

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00277

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00108

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00119

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000656

AC:

100

AN:

152336

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000658

AC XY:

AN XY:

74502

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000144

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00332

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000897

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000850

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000593

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00113

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3Other:1

Jul 08, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 22, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Jun 11, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 21, 2023

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 10

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Jan 11, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Aug 23, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.64

CADD

Benign

1.2

DANN

Benign

0.77

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over