18-46522095-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate

The NM_001384474.1(LOXHD1):c.5085+6G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000976 in 1,546,498 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000097 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

LOXHD1
NM_001384474.1 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.03841

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.21

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LOXHD1 (HGNC:26521): (lipoxygenase homology PLAT domains 1) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein consisting entirely of PLAT (polycystin/lipoxygenase/alpha-toxin) domains, thought to be involved in targeting proteins to the plasma membrane. Studies in mice show that this gene is expressed in the mechanosensory hair cells in the inner ear, and mutations in this gene lead to auditory defects, indicating that this gene is essential for normal hair cell function. Screening of human families segregating deafness identified a mutation in this gene which causes DFNB77, a progressive form of autosomal-recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL). Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

LOXHD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 77
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Illumina

LOXHD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LOXHD1	NM_001384474.1 link	c.5085+6G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 32 of 40	ENST00000642948.1	NP_001371403.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
LOXHD1	ENST00000642948.1 link	c.5085+6G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 32 of 40		NM_001384474.1	ENSP00000496347.1		A0A2R8Y7K4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152098

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000235

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000902

AC:

AN:

155176

AF XY:

0.0000978

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000233

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000968

AC:

135

AN:

1394282

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000888

AC XY:

AN XY:

687088

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

31522

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000281

AC:

AN:

35636

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25074

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35668

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000126

AC:

AN:

79140

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

47206

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

5686

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000112

AC:

121

AN:

1076500

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000190

AC:

AN:

57850

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000941

AC XY:

AN XY:

74426

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41530

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4808

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000235

AC:

AN:

68004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.478

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000145

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000982

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 77

Uncertain:3

Oct 28, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 23, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Nov 11, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change falls in intron 32 of the LOXHD1 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the LOXHD1 protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. This variant is present in population databases (rs373466081, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with LOXHD1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 47942). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant is not likely to affect RNA splicing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Feb 02, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The 5085+6G>A varia nt in LOXHD1 has not been reported in the literature nor previously identified b y our laboratory. This variant is located in the 5' splice region. Computational tools do not suggest and impact to splicing. However, this information is not p redictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. This variant has been identified in 0.03% (1/3182) of European American chromosomes in a broad population by the NHL BI Exome sequencing project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/). Although this v ariant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. In summary, the clinical significance of this va riant cannot be determined with certainty; however, based upon the computational splicing predictions and its presence in the general population, we would lean towards a more likely benign role. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.40

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.77

PhyloP100

1.2

Mutation Taster

=23/77

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.038

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.11

SpliceAI score (max)

0.050

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over