18-50227413-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 2P and 14B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1
The NM_145020.5(CFAP53):c.1513C>T(p.Arg505Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000189 in 1,614,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145020.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAP53 | NM_145020.5 | c.1513C>T | p.Arg505Cys | missense_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000398545.5 | NP_659457.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAP53 | ENST00000398545.5 | c.1513C>T | p.Arg505Cys | missense_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_145020.5 | ENSP00000381553 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000985 AC: 150AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000261 AC: 65AN: 249468Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000170 AC XY: 23AN XY: 135352
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000106 AC: 155AN: 1461724Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000839 AC XY: 61AN XY: 727144
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000985 AC: 150AN: 152326Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000792 AC XY: 59AN XY: 74498
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2022 | CFAP53: BP4 - |
Heterotaxy, visceral, 6, autosomal Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 07, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at