18-51065456-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_005359.6(SMAD4):c.989A>G(p.Glu330Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E330V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005359.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, PanelApp Australia
- Myhre syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coliInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
- juvenile polyposis syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- pulmonary arterial hypertensionInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAD4 | NM_005359.6 | c.989A>G | p.Glu330Gly | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 12 | ENST00000342988.8 | NP_005350.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAD4 | ENST00000342988.8 | c.989A>G | p.Glu330Gly | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 12 | 5 | NM_005359.6 | ENSP00000341551.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
​The p.E330G variant (also known as c.989A>G) is located in coding exon 8 of the SMAD4 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 989. The glutamic acid at codon 330 is replaced by glycine, an amino acid with similar properties. This mutation has been reported in multiple individuals diagnosed with juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) (Sayed, MG et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Nov;9(9):901-6; van Hattem, WA et al. Gut. 2008 May;57(5):623-7). In addition, an alteration at the same codon, p.E330K, was reported in a patient diagnosed with both JPS and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), whom had a family history of both conditions (Gallione, C et al. Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Feb;152A(2):333-9). This variant was not reported in population-based cohorts in the following databases: Database of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (dbSNP), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) and 1000 Genomes Project. To date, this alteration has been detected with an allele frequency of approximately 0.01% (greater than 7,000 alleles tested) in our clinical cohort (includes this individual). Based on protein sequence alignment, this amino acid position is completely conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be probably damaging and deleterious by PolyPhen and SIFT in silico analyses, respectively. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this variant is likely to be pathogenic.
not provided Other:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at