18-51065592-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_005359.6(SMAD4):c.1125C>T(p.Ala375Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005359.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMAD4 | NM_005359.6 | c.1125C>T | p.Ala375Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 9 of 12 | ENST00000342988.8 | NP_005350.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251346Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135858
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461736Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727170
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Carcinoma of pancreas;C0345893:Juvenile polyposis syndrome;C0796081:Myhre syndrome;C1832942:Juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome Benign:1
- -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at