18-51067009-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_005359.6(SMAD4):​c.1140-10T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000398 in 1,604,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SMAD4
NM_005359.6 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001397
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0830

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SMAD4 (HGNC:6770): (SMAD family member 4) This gene encodes a member of the Smad family of signal transduction proteins. Smad proteins are phosphorylated and activated by transmembrane serine-threonine receptor kinases in response to transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta signaling. The product of this gene forms homomeric complexes and heteromeric complexes with other activated Smad proteins, which then accumulate in the nucleus and regulate the transcription of target genes. This protein binds to DNA and recognizes an 8-bp palindromic sequence (GTCTAGAC) called the Smad-binding element (SBE). The protein acts as a tumor suppressor and inhibits epithelial cell proliferation. It may also have an inhibitory effect on tumors by reducing angiogenesis and increasing blood vessel hyperpermeability. The encoded protein is a crucial component of the bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathway. The Smad proteins are subject to complex regulation by post-translational modifications. Mutations or deletions in this gene have been shown to result in pancreatic cancer, juvenile polyposis syndrome, and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
SMAD4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, PanelApp Australia
  • Myhre syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • juvenile polyposis syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • pulmonary arterial hypertension
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 18-51067009-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-51067009-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 139219.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00204 (310/151988) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00688 (286/41590). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00622. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 157 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 310 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005359.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SMAD4
NM_005359.6
MANE Select
c.1140-10T>C
intron
N/ANP_005350.1
SMAD4
NM_001407041.1
c.1140-10T>C
intron
N/ANP_001393970.1
SMAD4
NM_001407042.1
c.1140-10T>C
intron
N/ANP_001393971.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SMAD4
ENST00000342988.8
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.1140-10T>C
intron
N/AENSP00000341551.3
SMAD4
ENST00000591126.5
TSL:1
n.3141-10T>C
intron
N/A
SMAD4
ENST00000590499.1
TSL:4
n.188T>C
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 1 of 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00203
AC:
309
AN:
151870
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00685
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000442
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00240
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000470
AC:
118
AN:
250850
AF XY:
0.000398
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00652
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000226
AC:
328
AN:
1452168
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.000192
AC XY:
139
AN XY:
723052
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00612
AC:
204
AN:
33320
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000405
AC:
18
AN:
44460
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25998
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39646
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000349
AC:
3
AN:
86048
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52972
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000522
AC:
3
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000489
AC:
54
AN:
1103952
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000766
AC:
46
AN:
60020
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16
32
47
63
79
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00204
AC:
310
AN:
151988
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00211
AC XY:
157
AN XY:
74316
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00688
AC:
286
AN:
41590
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
16
AN:
15202
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3456
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10534
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000442
AC:
3
AN:
67876
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
5
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15
31
46
62
77
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00187
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00206
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000578
AC:
2
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
May 02, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.1140-10T>C variant affects a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. Mutation taster predicts benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is found in 66/120780 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0005464, which greatly exceeds the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.000002) in this gene, suggesting this variant is benign. In addition, independent clinical diagnostic laboratories classify the variant as Benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical laboratories. Based on the high prevalence of the variant in the general population, it was classified as Benign.

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SMAD4: BS1

not specified Benign:4
Mar 04, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Mar 11, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 14, 2014
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 07, 2018
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Jan 23, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Mar 09, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 06, 2025
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The intron variant NM_005359.6(SMAD4):c.1140-10T>C has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant, to our knowledge. The c.1140-10T>C variant is observed in 12/5,008 (0.2396%) alleles from individuals of 1kG All background in 1kG, which is greater than expected for the disorder. The c.1140-10T>C variant is not predicted to disrupt the existing acceptor splice site 8bp upstream by any splice site algorithm. The c.1140-10T>C variant results in a substitution of a base that is not predicted conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Benign.

Juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Mar 21, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic.

Aug 19, 2024
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Uncertain:1
May 21, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.1140-10T>C intronic variant results from a T to C substitution 10 nucleotides upstream from coding exon 9 in the SMAD4 gene. This variant was previously reported in the SNPDatabase as rs186332162. Based on data from the 1000 Genomes Project, the C allele has an overall frequency of approximately 0.1% (2/2098) total alleles studied. The highest observed frequency was 0.94% (1/106) African-American SW alleles. Based on data from the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), the C allele has an overall frequency of approximately 0.09% (12/13006) total alleles studied, having been observed in 0.25% (11/4406) African American alleles and 0.01% (1/8600) European American alleles. This nucleotide position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. Using the BDGP and ESEfinder splice site prediction tools, this alteration is not predicted to have any significant effect on this acceptor/donor splice site; however, direct evidence is unavailable. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.

Myhre syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Carcinoma of pancreas;C0345893:Juvenile polyposis syndrome;C0796081:Myhre syndrome;C1832942:Juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome Benign:1
Aug 23, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.74
PhyloP100
-0.083
PromoterAI
0.0076
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00014
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs186332162; hg19: chr18-48593379; API