18-51067094-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_005359.6(SMAD4):c.1215C>T(p.His405His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000254 in 1,611,820 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005359.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMAD4 | NM_005359.6 | c.1215C>T | p.His405His | synonymous_variant | Exon 10 of 12 | ENST00000342988.8 | NP_005350.1 | |
SMAD4 | NM_001407041.1 | c.1215C>T | p.His405His | synonymous_variant | Exon 10 of 12 | NP_001393970.1 | ||
SMAD4 | NM_001407042.1 | c.1215C>T | p.His405His | synonymous_variant | Exon 10 of 12 | NP_001393971.1 | ||
SMAD4 | NR_176265.1 | n.1753C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 10 of 13 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000278 AC: 7AN: 251478Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000247 AC: 36AN: 1459678Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 726286
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152142Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74312
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
The SMAD4 p.His405= variant was identified in 1 of 326 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from circulating tumour DNA in an individual with pancreatic cancer (Kukita 2018). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs751732234) as “with likely benign allele” and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics and Color). The variant was not identified in LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 8 of 282,856 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: East Asian in 3 of 19,948 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), South Asian in 3 of 30,616 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), African in 1 of 24,966 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), and European in 1 of 129,178 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), while it was not observed in the Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish or Other populations. The p.His405= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs at a non-highly conserved nucleotide outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome Benign:1
- -
Juvenile polyposis syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at