18-57697620-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001374385.1(ATP8B1):āc.696T>Cā(p.Asp232Asp) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.999 in 1,613,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 805,295 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001374385.1 splice_region, synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP8B1 | NM_001374385.1 | c.696T>C | p.Asp232Asp | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 8/28 | ENST00000648908.2 | NP_001361314.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP8B1 | ENST00000648908.2 | c.696T>C | p.Asp232Asp | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 8/28 | NM_001374385.1 | ENSP00000497896.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.994 AC: 151182AN: 152032Hom.: 75182 Cov.: 29
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.998 AC: 250904AN: 251298Hom.: 125263 AF XY: 0.999 AC XY: 135681AN XY: 135838
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.999 AC: 1460930AN: 1461766Hom.: 730057 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.999 AC XY: 726823AN XY: 727192
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.994 AC: 151297AN: 152150Hom.: 75238 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.995 AC XY: 73997AN XY: 74378
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 02, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Cholestasis, intrahepatic, of pregnancy, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at