18-63335257-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM2PP5_ModerateBP4
The NM_002035.4(KDSR):c.879G>A(p.Gln293Gln) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000647 in 1,607,504 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002035.4 splice_region, synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KDSR | NM_002035.4 | c.879G>A | p.Gln293Gln | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 9/10 | ENST00000645214.2 | NP_002026.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KDSR | ENST00000645214.2 | c.879G>A | p.Gln293Gln | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 9/10 | NM_002035.4 | ENSP00000494352.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152194Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 250812Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135570
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000687 AC: 100AN: 1455310Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0000663 AC XY: 48AN XY: 724478
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152194Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74356
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Erythrokeratodermia variabilis et progressiva 4 Pathogenic:2
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Juno Genomics, Hangzhou Juno Genomics, Inc | - | PM2_Supporting+PS3_Moderate+PM3_Strong+PP4 - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jun 13, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at