18-70142333-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_173630.4(RTTN):c.2536G>A(p.Val846Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00015 in 1,609,074 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173630.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- microcephalic primordial dwarfism due to RTTN deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- bilateral generalized polymicrogyriaInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000773 AC: 117AN: 151292Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000182 AC: 45AN: 247260 AF XY: 0.000179 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000823 AC: 120AN: 1457672Hom.: 1 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000772 AC XY: 56AN XY: 725422 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000799 AC: 121AN: 151402Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000825 AC XY: 61AN XY: 73904 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
- -
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
RTTN-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at